Writ petition challenging the State's refusal to extend the petitioner's parole. Court held that as the period for extension sought in the 2014 application had long expired by the time of this 2023 decision, the petition no longer survives and was dismissed as infructuous.
No relief; writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:40688 OF 2014
Between:
Rajamoor Ram Reddy, Convict No. 4185, S/o.ChinnaBal Reddy, aged about 33'years, R/o. H.No.4-32l'1 , Marikal(V), Dhanwada(Mandal), Mahabubnagar Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Courtmay be pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the RespondentsIn not considering application of the Petitioner 22-12-2014 for extension ofparole period as arbitrary, illegal, violative of principles of naturaljustice apart fromviolative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequentlydirect the Respondents to extend the period ofparole of the Petitioner i.e., RajamoorRam Reddy, Convict No.4185, S/o. Chinna Bal Reddy, aged about 33years,Rl/o.H.No.4-32l1,Marikal (V), Dhanwada (tMandal), Mahabubnagar Dist for a furtherperiod of four months as my mother is suffering from heart disease and hypertension.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WP MP. NO: 50990 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to extend the period of parole of the Petitioner i.e., Rajamoor Ram Reddy, Convict No. 4185, Sio. Chinna Bal Reddy, aged about 33 years, R/o. H. No. 4-3211 , Marikal (V), Dhanwada (lVandal), lvlahabubnagar Dist. for a further period of four months i.e. from 12-01-2015 to 12-05-2015, pending High Court Appeal No. 806 of 2010.
Cotnsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAJAMOOR RAM REDDY (PARTY-IN-PERSON) Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
(
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
U/RIT PETITION No.4O688 of 2014
ORDER:
This writ petition has been hled questioning the action of the respondents in not considering the application of the petitioner dated 22.12.2014 for extension of parole period, for a further period of four months, as his mother is suffering from heart disease and hypertension, as arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice.
Since the period of extension sought for by the petitioner had expired long back, this Court is of the opinion that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication in this writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANI REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I (-)b SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRI RAJAIMOOR RANI REDDY, (PARTY-|N-PERSON) tOpUCl 2 Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of T'eiangani at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies BSR GJP >&r'-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0211112023
ORDER
WP.No.40688 of 2014
1t{ E STAl.€ o
PI
!
.lIL-' N0! ?[2] ol
* L
Di.t c !'"
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WITHOUT COSTS
[[r.'\tJ )> \ )'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition challenging the rejection of a parole extension application survives when the sought period has long expired.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAJAMOOR RAM REDDY
STATE OF TELANGANA
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
