This writ petition challenged the legality and arbitrariness of a notification by the Commissioner of Police regulating beauty businesses. The Court relied on a prior batch order dated 28.09.2021 to dispose of the petition without costs.
The Writ Petition is disposed of in terms of the Common Order dated 28.09.2021 without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY HE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 30516 OF 2023
Between:
lvliyapur Beauty And Spa, Rep. by its Proprietor Bandavath Raju, S/o. Bandavath Shanker, Hindu, Aged about 33 years, Occ ; Business, R/o. Plot No.30, Sy.No.211, Aditya Nagar Colony, Madinaguda, Serilingampally, Miyapur, Hyderabad, Telangana State-
.,...PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more preferably one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the aclion of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned notification No.(L&O)/Ma/314O1201O, dated 30-06-20'10passed by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, violative of Article 14, 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of lndia, contrary to theprovisions of the Hyderabad l City Polbe Act, 1348 Fasli and consequently set-aside the same against the 't petitioner, rn the interest of justice.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2023
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praytng that in the circumstances Stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned notification No.(L&O)/M4l3i4O/2O10, dated 30-06-2010 passed by the 2nd respondent against the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RAJANIKANTH JWALA
Counsel for the Respondents : AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following ORDER
I )
I I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.30516 of 2023
ORDER:
This u'rit petition is filed seeking the Court to declare the action of respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned notification No.(L&O)/M4 I 3140 /201O, dated 30.06.2O 1O as illegal and arbitrary
\ \
2
1
C \T8R.I \ p lr)516 101.1
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,
shall stand closed.
SD/.A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTAIJIREGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY/I L-1r\ I SECTION OFFICER
SA GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0211112023
ORDER
WP.No.3O516 ot 2023
-/::-
rtrE STArG- o
t
c)
0 t ll0] zi?l
zo!t
//v * t
.<1)
o5-q pr,.T Ci
DISPOSING OF THE W.P
WITHOUT COSTS.
r\h-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned notification under Section 28 of Hyderabad City Police Act, 1348 Fasli issued by the Commissioner of Police is illegal and arbitrary.
Whether the petitioner's business is violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
lvliyapur Beauty And Spa
The State of Telangana
Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad City
Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Commissionerate
Station House Officer, Miyapur Police Station
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
