Writ petition challenging enforcement of a US divorce decree was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF NOVEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. EHASKARREDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 22150 OF 2023
Between:
Raghu Boda, s/o Ramaswamy Boda, Aged about 58years, Occ-Pvt Employee Presently residing at No.303.1 View Valley Trail, Katy 77493 fexas U.S.A. Rep by GPA Holder V.Roopa w/o Vanguri Yalamanda,Ageabout42 years Occ- Housewife, Permanent R/o H.No.5-2-11511 ,Tirumala Nagar, H.B.Colony, Moulali,Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court may be pleased to issue a'W.rit, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the foreignjudgment MutualConsentDivorce passed in Case No.20-879982-DO daled 2-4-2O21 by the Sessions Court heldin the courthouse, in the City of Pontiac, Countyof Oakland, State of Michigan' USA is enforceable in lndia asper variousprovision of C.P.C. andFamily Courts Act and consequently direct the official respondentsnot to take anycoercive steps against thepetitioner in,the interest ofjustice. lA NO:'f OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court maybe pleasedto direct the respondents not to take any coercive stepswith regard to any sort of matrimonial dispute between thepetitioner andthe respondent No.4, pending disposal of the writpetitioner.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SHANTA RAMREPRESENTINGFOR I SI[K. BHOO LAKSHMIBHOO LAKSHMI
SI[K. BHOO LAKSHMIBHOO LAKSHMI
t Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: ASST. GPFOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: - -- - The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRI T PETITION No. 22150 of2O23
ORDER:
Sri Sill;:'Lta Rant. iearneci counsel reoresenting Smt. K. Bhocla-xm r . ietrrncrl ccunsei a,.ppearing for the petitioner, seeks pefinlssion of Lhc Court to withdraw this writ petition with a iibci'1, tc :rva.ri il'ie remedies as available under lau/.
Pl'r-missron ers sr-rlighL for rs accorded.
Ar:cordrngly,tirt '"r,rit petition is dismissed as
wittrdrieu,n br qrantine iiberty as prayed for. No costs
As a st'quel, thc miscellaneous petitions pending, if
any, sh:rl1 staird closeC .
\
SD/. MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTAbTT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// cab SECNON OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SFlfK. BHOO LAKSH|M|, Advocate tOpUCl 2. fwo CCs to GP FOR HOIME, High Court for the State bf Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copres BN GJP
r i i I ! !tI i
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 11112023
ORDER
WP.No.22150 of 2023
1\AE STA].
q
o
1 7 N!''l ?i.l?l .b
oo
+
*
OESPAtC
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION I AS WITHDRAWN I 'WITHOUT COSTS "- \w"u, @apt* r \ ^.9 lN"
Raghu Boda
State of Telangana
Sandhya Rani Silumtrla
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
Mohd. Sanaullah Ansari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
