Common order dismissing Writ Petitions as infructuous because the cause of action did not survive for adjudication by the High Court of Telangana.
Dismissing the writ petitions as infructuous without costs and closing any miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NOS:2807 0 AND 31298 0F 2013
W.P.No.28070 of 2013
Eetween:
.....PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a Writ. Order or Direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of"Mandamus" declare the action of the 1'r respondent in issuing G.O.Ms.No.100. dated 26-4-2013 by providing therein for minimum ticket
admission prices for Air-conditioned and Air-cooled theatrr)s and infurther notifying a price of cnly Rs.10/- contrary to the recom mendati,cns made by the High Power Commiltee and in also fixing a minimump€,rcenlage for such category of seats as illegal. arbitrary. unconstitutional ultra v res AP Cinemas (Regulation) Act. 19 Z0 and AP Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1971 and strike down the said G.O. to the extent of making suchp'ovisicn{; a1dpermit the Cinema theatres inc uding thepetitioners to collect Rs.20l o' any otherprice deemed appropriate by them for the lowest class of admissions in the cinema theatres.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2013(Wf 'MP. NO: 34851 OF 2013
Petition Under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the ci-cum:tances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court nray be pleased to direct the respondenls to permit the petitioners to collect Rs.20l- ar; the minimum price for the lowest (,lass as recommended by the High Power Cc,mmittee in its recommendations perding disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petilioners : SRI NARESH REDDY CHItINOL -rrr
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR HOME
W.P.NO: ,1293 95 2r)l 3
Between:
7',
l0.Srinivasa Theatre 35MM AC, Opp Bus STand, Kodangal Road, Tandur, RR District. Rep by its Managing Partner Kalva Suresh.
.....PETITIONERS
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of"Mandamus" declare the action of the 1st respondent in issuing G.O.Ms.No.100, dated 26-04-2013 by providing therein for minimum ticket admission prices for Air-conditioned and Air-cooled theatres and infurther notifying a price of only Rs.10/- contrary to the recommendations made by the High Power Committee and in also fixing a minimum percentage for such category of seats as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, ultra vires AP Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1970 and AP Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1 971 and strike down the said G.O. to the extent of making such provisions and permit the Cinema theatres including thepetitioners to collect Rs.20l or any otherprice deemed appropriate by them for the lowest class of admissions in the cinema theatres.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 3888'l OF 2013 )
Petition Under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto direct the respondents to permit thepetitioners to collect Rs.20l as theminimum price for the lowest class as recommended by the High Power Committee in its recommendations pending disposal of the writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI C.TULASI KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondents : AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following COMMON ORDER
1
I
\
THE HONOI.IRABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BTIASKAR I(EDDY
WRIT PETITION Nos. 28070 and 312'98 of 2t)13
COMMON OIi.DER:
Learned counsel appearing for the pelitioners
submits that the cause in these writ pr:titio:rs; does not
survive for adiudication and hence, the writ pr:titions have
become infru<:tuous.
In view cf the said submission, these Writ F,etitions
are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Miscellareous petitions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
SD/. P.Ch, NIAGA3HUSHAMBA ASSIS T,\NI' REGI$TRAR L ,TRUE COPY//
SE:CTION OFFICER
To
z. One CC to Sri l,laresh ReddyChinnolla, Advocate(OPUCI
SA GJP
i I I I I
HIGH COURI-
DATED:0911012023
COMMON OFIDER
{66'<br>t rlittl ?S
9r,
WP.Nos.28070 AND 31298 of 2013
DISMISSING TI- E WRIT PETII'IONS AS INFRUCI'UO US WITHOUl' COSTS.
(1 )
Ttr'
c,i>
\o
Venkateswara Theatre, Nalgonda Road. Miryalguda and others
Government of A.P.
The Committee For Revision of Cinema Theatre Rates
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
