High Court disposed of a writ petition under Article 226 without costs after the petitioner failed to receive the final report regarding the closure of his FIR by the investigating police station.
The writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents-police to furnish a copy of the final report to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
HIGH COURT FORTHESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAYOF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEC.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 24108 OF2023
Between:
Mehmood Raheem, S/o. Syedlsmail, Aged about38 Years, Occ Business, R6-n.No.tg-+-zbttFlgll-71A,Salaheen Colony, NawabsahebKunta, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 of the constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith,the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ,orderor direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlToF MANDAMUS declaringthe action of the respondent in not registering the crimeagainst the concerned personon the complaints of the petitioner dated 2'1.08.2023,is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violationof the fundamental rightsguaranteed under the constitution of lndia, contrary to the criminalprovisionand as well judgment of the Hon'blesupreme court in Lalitha Kumari's case andconsequentlydirect the 5th respondent to registera crime.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Sectron'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to register a crime against the concerned persons on the complaints of the petitionet daled 21 .O8.2023, under the appropriate sections of the lndian Penal Code, forthwith pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.JAGAN
Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
IION'III,E SITI .IUSTICE C.V.BIiASKAR IIEDDY
\/IIIT PETITION No.24108 of 2023
ORDER:
This rvrit pctition is filed seeking the lollowing relief
I
I
2
pctitioner revcals cognizable offcnccs, thc rcsp()n(len t - Police have not taken any action against thc accuscd till date.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed
SD/- C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTAXLT REGISTRAR //rRUE COPY/I <4b SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0611012023
ORDER
(irir srAir
( .}-
IU
-) [ 6 t{0\l 2[t]
..-,.,).<br>..i r) i.- c, D lil f ,"
WP.No.24108 of 2023
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS L{i$ b- -r.Y
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of after the petitioners fail to receive the final report of the police investigation regarding the closure of their complaint as false in nature.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Lalitha Kumari's caseReferred¶1
Mehmood Raheem
State of Telangana
Commissioner of Police
Deputy Commissioner of Police
Assistant Commissioner of Police
Station House Officer
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
