The High Court of Telangana dismissed the writ petition filed by cinema operators as infructuous based on counsel's submission that the cause no longer required adjudication.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[32e61
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINI'H DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 18538 OF 2015
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of rhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction jore particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in issuing G.O.Ms.No.'100 Home (General. A..l ) Department, dated 26-04-2013 by providing therein for minimum ticket admission prices for air-conditioned and aircooled theatres and in further, notifying a price of only Rs.10/- contrary to the recommendations made by the High power committee and in also fixing a minimum percentage for such category of seats as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, ultra vires of A.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1g55 and A.p. Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1970.
t.A. NO: 't oF 2015(VUPMP. NO:23983 OF 2015)
Petition under Section'1 51 CPCpraying thatin thet.irr;u nr:;ta nces stated in the affidavit filed n support of thepetition, theHigl'r Coutl tnal' be pleasedto direct the 2nd Resg ondent topermit thePetitioner tlrun tl'e theatresas per application dated 12.06-2015,pending disposalof the'rVrit Pet tior).
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI K.DURGAPRASAD
Counsel forthe Respondents: AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEC.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.18538of 2015
ORDER:
When the matter istaken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing forthe petitionerssubmits that the cause in the writpetitiondoes not survive for adjudication
and hence, the writpetition has becomeinfructuous'
In view of the saidsubmission, the Writ Petitionis
dismissed as infructuous.No costs.
Miscellaneouspetitions, if any, pendingshallstand
closed.
7
'R5.!i,i[ftf.'S[lHi[ /TTRUEcoPY,l secffiorrrcen
To' . -'IRGA PRASAD' Advocate toPucl 1. OneCC to SRIK'DURUA rxone' '."^- - ,^- .,-^. ctate of Telangana relansanaat HoME'Highcourt for thE state ''I!3"rg3:o',idi t;
3.Two CD Copies BSR GJPYl-
\
t
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0911C12023
ORDER
WP.No.18538 of 2015
-)
I
t: I
!
I {:
s.
{r r<br>'
''. -.. ;:i
DISMISSING'I-HE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTIJOUS,
WITHOUT CC STS G.$ a9)!--r'\Y\ \o\z'
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication being infructuous.
Sensalion Sunshine
State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Police
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
