The writ petition challenging the arbitrary and illegal proceedings of NIT Warangal and subsequently issued circulars as arbitrary and illegal was dismissed as infructuous because the cause of action had lapsed and did not survive for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEJ SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 2636 oF 2016
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol theConstitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court may be pleased to lssue an appropriate writ, order or directionmore particularly in the
nature of writ of [Vlandamus decraring the proceedings F.No.ii3-g/201 1-TS Ir dated 23-08-2013 and 15-01-2014 of the ist Respondent and the consequential advertisement No.1i2015 and circular No.Nlrw/Dir/20.15 dated 30-12-2015 of the 2"d Respondent, as arbitrary, ilegar, in vioration of the provisicns of Nationar lnstitutes of rechnology Act, 2oo7 and in violation of Article 14 of the constitution of lndia, and consequently set aside the same.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 3313 0F 2016)
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumst€lnces stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the Advertisement No.Admn.o1/2015 issued by the 2nd Respondent, pending disposar of the above writ p.tition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INOIA
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 and 3: SRI T. MAHENDER RAO ('SC FOR NIT T.S WARANGAL)
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J, SREENIVAS RAO
Writ Petition No.2636 of 2Ot6
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for consideration, Smt Kathyayani, learned counsel representing Sri Subba Rao Korrapati, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed
ASS,,iRfiIhI="iJHjH //rRUE COPY/' , ecrp6rrcea
I
to'1 . on. CC to Sri Subba Rao Korrapati'-Advocate, toPUCl 2. one ccto Sri c,oi 6'i1""i?;;i';;:'r;ilivs"lititorGi:neralof lndia
a. bo,I"'"%to sri T. MahenderRao (SC for Nlr r's wARANGAL)toPucl
TJ GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410912023
ORDER
WP.No.2636 of 2016
'-'.;ll';',,.*
\ \ t\x''\t}
. .'
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS.
/-..^,
\e/
t-
.Y\q ).)
Alur Veeresh Babu and 5 Others
Union of India
National Institute of Technology Warangal
The Registrar, National Institute of Technology Warangal
Justice J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
