This order dismisses the writ petition filed by a petitioner challenging his rejection for selection as a Police Constable Trainee. The court held that the cause of action no longer survives, leading to the dismissal of the petition as infructuous without costs.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 I
f
IN THE HIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
IUONDAY, THE FOURTHDAYOF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT P ETITION NO:18973OF 2017
Between:
Kuooala Batakrishna, S/oBiksham,Age28 Years, Occ: Selected as SCT PC (TSSP), Registered No. 144461 , RloH. No .10-79115, Ramakrishna Nagar, Peerzadiguda, Uppal, RangaReddy District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of|he constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith,the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order ordirection more in the nature of lVlandamus declaring Action of the 1strespondent in rejectingthe claim of the petitioner for selection as stipendiary cadetTrainee ( SCT) Police constable (AR) (Men)in cyberabad/ Rangareddy Districtinpursuancetothe Notificationvide Rc.No.151/Recl.tAdmn.1l2o15daled 31.12.2O15 in first 20% of posts meant for Local and Non Locals throughproceedingsin R.C.No.151/Rec.lAdmn,1l2O15-17 dated 21 .4.2017 is arbitrary,illegal, unjust andviolative of Article,14, and 16 of Constitution of lndiaand consequently declarethat the petitioneris entitledto be selected and appointedas Stipendiarycadet Trainee (scT) Police constable (AR) (Men) in cyberabad/RangareddyDistrictin pursuanceto the Notification vide Rc. No. 151/Rect./Admn.1/2015dated31 .12.2015 by dulyawardingweight
!'
age marks for his driving license with all consequential benefits including seniority and pay and allowances.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WP MP. NO: 23125OF 20171
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for selection and appointment to the post of Stipendiary Cadet Trainee (SCT) Police Constable (AR) (lven) in Cyberabad/ Rangareddy District pursuant to the Rc. No. 151/Rect./Admn.ll 2O15 dated. 31 .12.2015 by suspending the operation of the orders passed by the lst respondent in R.C.No. 151/Rec./Admn,1l2O15-17 dated 21 .4.2017.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KRISHNA KISHORE KOVVURI for SRt K.SARATH
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
. l )
Y I
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.18973 of 20t7
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the follon ing reliet
"...7o issue a Writ, Order or direction rnore in the nature of Mandamus, declartng Action of the 1* respondent in rejecting the claim of the petitioner for selection as Stipendiarg Cadet Tra rce 6CT:) Police Constable (AR) (Men) in Cybarabacl/ Rangareddy District in pursuance to other Notification uide Rc./[o. 151/Rect.Admn.1/ 2015 dated 31.12.2015 in first 2O% of posts meant for Local and Non Locals through proceedings in R.C.No.151/ Rec./Admn,1/ 2015-17 d.ated 21.4.2017 is arbitrarg, illegal, unjust and uiolatiue of ARticle, 14 and 16, of Constitution of India and consequentlg declare that the petitioner ls entitled to be selected and appointed os Stipendiarg Cadet Trainee (SCT) Potice Constable (AR) (Men) in Cgbarabad/ Rangareddg District in pursuance to other NotiJication uide Rc.I{o. 1 51 / Rect.Admn. 1 / 2015 dated 31. 12.20 1 S by dulg awarding ueightage marks for his driuing license uith all consequential benefits includ,ing seniority and pay and allowances and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court mag deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. "
Sri Krishna Kishore Kowuri, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly informed this Court that the cause in the rvrit petition does not survive.
,/l
i I i
'2
f
\
.)a Accordingi-v. the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Mis cr: ll:rncous appLcations, pending if any, shaii stand
closecl.
SD/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTA]!T REGISTRAR c-jg SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY/'
To,
*f
HIGH COURT
DATED:0410912023
{
-'..
1l
l
I
i,i, Il [iliiti?}
ORDER
WP.No.18973 of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking selection as Stipendiary Cadet Trainee survives the underlying facts.
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous.
Kuwoala Batakrishna
The Telangana State Level Police Recruitment Board
The State of Telangana
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
