Writ petition challenging exclusion of petitioners from backlog vacancies for SC posts was disposed of. The Court recorded that respondents complied with an interim direction and closed the petition without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l
[3303 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIRSTDAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEJ SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 20316OF 2017
Between:
2 5;i: i. uattit<a, W/dSampatnl Age ao years'Occ UnemployeeRl/o H'No' 46-4-210, Enumamula Balalinagar,Warangal( Urban) O'.,''"t...rrr,fl
ONERS
AND
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitution of lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or directionmore particularly a writ of mandamus by declaring the entire action ofthe respondentsin not considering the case of the petitioneis for appointment to thepost ofOffice subordinateagainst back log vacancies.meant for Scheduled castsnotified by the 4th respondent videhisletter Roe. No. 1305/8/2016 dated 22.4.2017and restrictingthe consideration onlyto the candidates whose nameswere sponsored by the 1't and2nd respondents is as highly illegal, arbitrary, uniust, improper,discriminatoryand contraryto the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme court reportedin 1996(6) SCC216 and in violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitutionof lndia and consequently to directthe respondents to consider the candidatureof the petitioners for the post of office subordinate against back log vacanciesmeant for SC communities available in the 4th respondent organization alongwithother candidateswhosenameswere sponsored by the 1st and 2nd respondents inpursuanceof requestof the4th respondent vide his letter in Roc.No.1 305/8/2016 , daied22.4.2O17
I.A. N O:1 oF 2017(W PMP. NO: 24887 0F 20171
Petition under Sectign.]!t CpC praying that in the crrcunrstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, tir""High'corrt may b. pleased to direct the respondents to consider the candidature Lt ini p-utition"rs for the post of office subordinate aqainst back log vacancies meant for SC commr-rnitie:s avairabre in the 4lh respondent organization arong w.th-oir,",. .riaiortes wh.se names were sponsored by the 1st & 2nd respondents in pursuance of requesl of the 4th respondent vide his ,etter in Roc. No.1305 tsilzoTa, date() 22.4.2017 pending disposar of wp and pass such other order or orders as this Hon,ble Tribunar may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of t|re case pending di:;posar of the writ petition
Counsel for the petitioner : SRI S.SATYANARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3 & 5 : Gp FOR EMPLOYMENT Counsel for the Respondent no.4 : Gp FOR ANIMAL HUSBANDARY The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.2O316 of 2OL7
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
"......to issue a WiL Order or direction more particularlg a utit of mandamus bg declaring the entire action of tte respondents in not considering the case of the petitioners for appointment to the post of Offi.ce Subordinate against backlog uacancies meant for Scheduled Castes notified by the 4r, respondent uide his letter Roc.No.13O5/B/2016 dated 22.O4.2O17 and restricting the consideration only to tLe candid,ates uthose names uere sponsored by ths 1't and 2"d respondents is as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjus| improper, disciminatory and contrary to the law laid doutn by the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 1996 (6) SCC 216 and in uiolation of Articles 14, 16 and 2 1 of the Constitution of India and consequentlg to direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners for the post of Olftce Subordinate against back log uacancies meant for SC communities auailable in the 4th respondent organization along uith other candidates whose nornes uere sponsored by the 1"t and 2"d respondents in pursuance of request of the 4th respondent uide his letter in Roc. No. 1305/8/2016, dated 22.04.2O17 and pass....."
)
1
.:.....
20171 the respondentsconsideredtheclaim ofthe petitioncr andprayed to close the Writ Petition
As a sequel, themiscellaneouspetitions pending'if
any, shall standclosed
/ITRUECOPY/I
ASSrs?iilRfcYtt?[FF .rtTr,o*oFFlcER
To
1 2 3 Hffi it$j{J',r'Hfji:::::tkff:ff *i::::::'"'"n'"' at HvderjrbadIOU I ] 4 Two'CDCoptes
Ki. GJPYf-
l
I
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:01/09/2023
ORDER
?. E ST^}S _
,,..',)'
.-)
i] 11 sr1 2m
^y''
WP.No.20316 ot 2012
CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS.
+L#4 |,r. {td,s
T.Sampath
The District Employment Officer, Warangal
The State of Telangana
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
