Writ petition regarding transfer and promotion was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear for hearing.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33031
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOTJSAND AND TWENW THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE J SREENIVASRAO
WRIT PETITIONfiR) NO: 3636 OF 2017
Between
L.K. MURTHY, S/o Appala Swamy, aged about58 years,Occ Reserve Sub- lnspector, 7th Battalion, T.S.S.P., Dichpally,NizamabadDistrict, Ryo. Dichpally, Nizamabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewilh, theHighCourt. may be pleased to declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the caseof the applicant for transfer to his native State of AndhraPradeshas perthe Section- 78 of the A.P. State Reorganization Act not considering his claimfor promotion to the post of Revenue lnspector in the State of Telanganaas per G.O.Ms No. 595' dl. 17.O9.2014 even though the applicant is a senior mostin the cadre of Reserve
Sub-lnspector,fullyeligibleandinthezoneofconsiderationisasillegal,arbitrary' unjust, unconstitutionaland contrary to the A'P' ReorganizationAct' and consequentlydirecttherespondentstoconsiderthepromote/transfertheapplicant as Reservelnspector as per the A'P' Reorganization Act' 2014 and as per law with all consequentialbenefits'
Counsel forthe Petitioner: SRI'G TUHIN KUMAR (NOT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondents: AGP FOR HOME
The Court madethe following: ORDER
HOI{'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETITION(TRI No.3636 of 2OL7
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 31.08.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and to give one opportunit5r, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" on ot.o9.2023.
Miscellaneous petitions, if aly, pending in this Writ
Petition, shall stand closed.
\
SDI- MOHO. SANAULI.AHANSARI ASSISTANtr BEGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I rffi-SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 2.. TwoOne CC CCsto toSRl. GPG TUHIN FOR HOME KUMAR ,High Advocate Court [OPUC]for the State of Telanganaat Hyderabad. [OUTI 3. Two CD Copies SB' GJP
4o'E;:-'
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 l0gl2023
ORDER
1 L4
G
ar
7
A,:
t
o, A=.-:
o
a l.- IJJ
Fdo \s LO
<br>*
Hc\r
WP(TR).No.3636 ot2017
DtsMlsslNc THE WRlrPETlrloN(TR) FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
rt
L.K. Murthy
The State of Telangana
The State of Andhra Pradesh
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
