S. Janardhan Reddy v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court considered a writ petition filed by S. Janardhan Reddy on behalf of a Church challenging the State's attempt to dispossess them of property. Relying on counsel's submission that respondents were not interfering pursuant to a 2016 order, the Court held no further adjudication was necessary and closed the petition without costs.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed without costs. Pending miscellaneous applications are also closed.
What the court decided
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
wRlT PET|T|ON NO.24512 0F 2016
Between:
S. Janardhan Reddy, S/o. S. Ram Reddy, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Pastor, Ri./o Plot No.57, H.No.3-6-70, Shubodaya Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-500 072, Telangana State.
...PETITIONER
AND
- 't. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
- 2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapul, Hyderabad.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding the dispossession of the petitioner Church property requires further adjudication.
Whether to stay proceedings pending disposal of the writ petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Janardhan Reddy
- respondent
The State of Telangana
- respondent
The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Qutbullapur Mandal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/24512/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court