Dismissed

Buchireddy Navad Reddy, v. The District Collector

Telangana HC22 Nov 2023WP/17519/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A three-judge bench of the Telangana High Court closed Writ Petition No. 17519 of 2011 as the merits were resolved by an earlier interim order in a connected MP matter, adjudicating nothing on the merits of the drainage encroachment challenge.

What did the court decide?

Closed the writ petition without costs as the matter was already resolved by an earlier interim order in a connected suit.

Buchireddy Navad Reddy, Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³¹

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY^{SECOND DAY OF NOVET\iIBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY THREE}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE J. SREENIVASRAO}

¶7

WRIT PETITION^{NO: 17519 OF 2011}

¶8

Between:

¶9

'1 . Buchireddy Navad Reddy, S/o. Late B.Raghava Red-dy, Ag.ed about S7,years, Occ: Agritulture,^{Resid-ent of AkulamailaramVillage, KandukurMandal,} Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

z. AucEiieOOV^(am Reddy,^{S/o. Late B.NarayanRed-dy, age! abo.ut72.years'} occ: Agri|ulture, Resident^{of AkulamailaramVillage, Kandukur Mandal,} Ranga Reddy District.

¶11

a. euitiir.ddy-[aiminarsimha^{Reddv,S/o. Late B.Naravanngf,OV'aq9!} 9O9y! 72years,'Occ:Agriculture,ResidentofAkulamailaramVillage,KanduKur Man-dal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

...,ETIT'ONERS

¶13

AND

¶14

The District Collector,^{Ranga Reddy District.} z. The Tansihar, Kandukur^{Mandal, Ranga Reddy District'} 5. fn" fuinOil Development^{Officer, KandukulMirldal,Ranga Reddypistrjct'} +. r'r," Execrliue engiheer,^{panchayatRaj, z.p. office,Ranga Reddy District at} Khairatabad HYderabad.

¶15

S. tfre CrJm^{pan'chayat rep. by its Sarpanch, AkulamailaramVillage, Kandikur} Mandal, Ranga ReddY^District.

¶16

iG d;m Pinchayat^{rep. by its Upa-Sarpanch, Akulamailaram Village'} Kandikur Mandal, Ranga^{Reddy District.}

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article^{226 of the constitution of lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High courtmaybe} pleased to issue a writ in the nature of^{MANDAMUS or any other appropriatewrit,} order or directions^{by declaringthe actionof the respondents in directly laying the} open Drainage Line^{(open nala) directlyto the Petitioners Patta Land in Sy.No.7 of} Panjaguda Revenue^{Village, Kandukur Mandal, R.R.District, as illegal, arbitrary} and unconstitutional and^{without authorityof law in the interest of justice.}

¶19

l.A. NO: 1 O^F 2011(WPMP.^{NO:21075 0F20111}

¶20

Petition under^{Section 151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in} the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct} the Respondents^{not to Lay open DrainageLineconnectionto the Petitioners} Patta Land i.e.,^{Sy.No.7 of Panjaguda RevenueVillage,KandukurMandal,} R.R.District,^{pendrngfinal disposal of the main W.P.}

¶21

Counsel for the^{Petitioners:SRI PRAKASHREDDY FOR SRI M.V.RAJARAAM} Counsel forthe Respondent^{Nos.1 TO 3: GP FOR REVENUE} Counsel for the^{RespondentNo.4: GP FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT} Counsel for the^{RespondentNos.S& 6:} -

¶22

The Court made the^{following: ORDER}

¶23

¶24

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.^SREENTVASRAO

¶25

Writ Petition No.17519^{of 2011}

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

When the matter is taken up^{for consideration,} Sri Prakash Reddy, learned^{counsel representing} Sri M.V.Raja Ram, learned^{counsel for the petitioners} submits that by virtue^of the^{interimorder grartedby this} Court in W.P.M.P.No.2|O75^{of 2011, dated 27 -06.2011,the} grievance of the^{petitioners is resolved.}

¶28

Recording the above submissions,^nofurther adjudication is required.

¶29

Accordingly, the Writ^{Petition is closed.No costs'}

¶30

Pending miscellaneous^{petitions,ifany, shall}

¶31

stand closed.

¶32

SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGIS R //TRUE COPYII

¶33

¶34

SECTION OFFICER

¶35

One CC to SRI M.V.RAJA RAAM, Advocate tOpUCl 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court'for the'State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶36

Two CCs to GP FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶37

Two CD Copies

PSK. G'!dx-

HIGH COURT

DATED:2211112023

ORDER

WP.No.17519 of 2011

S.T AT E o
7
q 1\ stt ttlx
{->
li
*
D s'rpi

¶44

CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION

¶45

WITHOUT COSTS.

Buchireddy Navad Reddy, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Buchireddy Navad Reddy, v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeelani Begum Vs The District Collector

M.Anjaiah, Vs the Govt of Ap.,Revenue Dept., and 15 Others

Smt.a.Indira , Lalitha Vs The State of Telangana

B.Shankar Vs The Mandal Revenue Officer

Smt. Thouti Raja Kumari Vs The State of Telangana

Thunga Pochaiah, Karimnagar District Vs District Collector, Karimnagar District and 3 Others