Partly allowed

Smt. Thouti Raja Kumari v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC22 Nov 2023WP/26500/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana issued an order dismissing Writ Petition No. 26500 of 2019, which was filed by a petitioner seeking to declare the demolition of her property illegal, as the petitioner sought and obtained permission to withdraw the petition with the withdrawal being allowed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn and subsequently dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

Smt. Thouti Raja Kumari Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2023)

[³³⁰³ ]

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶5

(Special Original J urisdiction)

¶6

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO: 26500 OF 20'19

¶10

Between:

¶11

Smt. Thouti Raja Kumari, W/o. Ravi, aged 42^years, Occ.^{house wife, Rl/o. H} No. 10-211312 Plot No.2, Chelpur Village, Ghanpur Mandal,^Presently Jayashankar Bhooparpaily Districr

¶12

...pETtfloNER

¶13

AND

¶14

1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principle Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat, Hyderabad

¶15

The District Collector, Jayashankar Bhoopalpally District at Bhupalpally (Warangal District)

¶16

The Joint Collector, Jayashankar Bhoopalpally^{District(Warangal District)} 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ghanpur Division, Ghanpur, Jayashankar Bhoopalpally District

¶17

The Tahsildar, Tahasildar Office, Ghanpur Mandal Ghanpur, Jayashankar Bhoopalpally District

¶18

Chelpur Grampanchayath, Chelpur Ghanpur Mandal, Jayashnakar Bhoopalpally District Rep by its Panchayath Secretary

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndia praying} that^{in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court^may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in taking steps to demolish the petitioners building bearing H No. 10-211312 in Plot^No.2 admeasuring 228.2 sq.^yards situated at Sy^{No. 26 of Chelpur Village,Ghanpur} Mandal, Jayashnakar Bhupalpally District^{(WarangalDistrict)} on^27.11.2019 without giving any notice or^proceedings, without^{jurisdiction, inspite of the status} quo orders are in force in WP No. 1712512017 dt. 18.05.2017 is illegal and avoid and opposed to Article 14, 19,21 and 300-4 of^Constitution of^{lndia and} consequently to direct the respondents 2 to 5^{not to interfere with the peaceful} possession and enjoyment of the petitioners house^property bearing H No.^'10-

¶21

211312 in Plot No.2 admeasuring 228.2 sq. yards situated at Sy No. 26 of Chelpur Village, Ghanpur Mandal, Jayashnakar Bhupalpally District (Warangal District) in question without following due process of law.

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the petitioners house bearing H No. 10-211312 in Plot No.2 admeasuring 228.2 sq. yards situated at Sy No. 26 of Chelpur Village, Ghanpur Mandal, Jayashnakar Bhupalpally District (Warangal District), pending disposal of the main writ petition.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 TO 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI G.NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR TGZPP,MPP,GPPS

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J.^SREENIVASRAO

¶27

WRIT PETITION No.265OO of^2OL9

¶28

ORDER:

¶29

Learned Counsel for the petitioner has^submitteda letter to the Registrar (Judicial) on^{10.11.2023seeking} permission of this Court to withdraw the writ^petition.

¶30

Basing on the letter dated LO.ll.2023,^{this matter is listed}

¶31

today under the caption "for Withdrawal".

¶32

Permission as sought for is accorded.

¶33

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed^as

¶34

withdrawn. No order as to costs.

¶35

Pending miscellaneous applications, if^{any, shall}

¶36

stand closed.

¶37

//TRUE COPYII

¶38

SD/. P. PADMANABHA DDY ASSISTANT REGI TRAR SECTION FICER

¶39

¶40

¶41

1 One CC to SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO, Advocate tOpUCI

¶42

2 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State oi Telanfiana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶43

3 One CC to SRI c.NAREDNER REDDY, SC FOR TGZPP, Mpp, Gpps loPUcI

¶44

¶45

Two CD CopiesV

PSK. GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:2211112023

ORDER

WP.No.26500 of 2019

gIATE Op
1
9
o
1\i&
l
1'\ tti -A
o l
+
-\ il i2'
" -,;

¶55

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶56

('4"
* p

Smt. Thouti Raja Kumari v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Thouti Raja Kumari v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeelani Begum Vs The District Collector

M.Anjaiah, Vs the Govt of Ap.,Revenue Dept., and 15 Others

Smt.a.Indira , Lalitha Vs The State of Telangana

B.Shankar Vs The Mandal Revenue Officer

Buchireddy Navad Reddy, Vs The District Collector

Thunga Pochaiah, Karimnagar District Vs District Collector, Karimnagar District and 3 Others