The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 18345 of 2008 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in court despite listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s6 ]
I ji
I I I II I I Ii i I I i i ii I i I I I I I : I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 18345 OF 2008
Between:
Ramdas Balaraj, S/o late R. Yellaiah Business Plot No.35/A Sai Suprabath Hostel Sai Nagar Malkajgiri, R.R District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1&2'rejecting the pleas of the Writ Petitioner for apportionment of compensation of acquiring the land of the petltioner for outer Ring Road Project(ORRP) an extent of 1-00 acre in Sy.No.166 at Dayara (V) Keesara(M) R.R District as arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.1 to pay the compensation amount to the land acquired onpar with the other lands at Dayara(V) Keesara(M) R.R District.
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents Nos 1&2 not to make the compensation amount of the
t I, I j ! i ! I
petitioner to the respondent No.3 of the land an extent of 1-00 acre in Sy.No.166 at Dayara (V) Keesara(M) R.R District pending disposal of the WP.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. SOMASUNDARAM
Gounsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI M. SIVANANDA KUMAR
The Court made the following: ORDER
: I t I t l I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.l8B4S of 2OO8
ORDER:
when this matter was listed on 16.02.2023, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon, this court directed to list the matter under the caption "for Dismissal,,.
Inspite of it, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. Therefore, this court is constrained to dismiss the writ petition for default/ non_prosecution.
Accordingry, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Misce,aneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand dismissed.
SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To, 1. One CC to SRI J. SOMASUNDARAM, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION, High Court for the State of Telangana.IOUTI
i 'l I
HIGH COURT
DATE D :06/03/2023
ORDER
.( *E sTArc:
4.
!) 1 $ [P$ ?$23
WP.No.18345 of 2008
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
F
RAMDAS BALARAJ
THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR
THE TAHASILDAR
MS METASIN TELECOME PVT LTD
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
