The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner challenging revenue proceedings as infructuous since the grounds for the cause of action did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 17822 OF 2009
Between:
...PET!TIONER
AND
The Respondents No.4 & 5 are Rl/o. Enugal Thanda, Hamlet of Muthojipet(V) Narsampet Mandal, District Warangal.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Official Respondents in issuing proceedings bearing Rc.No.E3/2105/09, dated 25-5-2OOg by the 2nd respondentJoint Collector and consequentialproceedings of the 3'd and 4th respondentin proceedings bearing Rc.No.Ei709l2009, dated 24-7-2009 & Rc.No.T/792l2008, dated 1-7-2009, respectively, as illegal, arbitrary, without any sanction oflaw
and/orjurisdiction and opposed to all cannons of justice besides being violtive of Principles of natural justice and consequenfly direct the official Respondents not to adopt.
A. NO: 1 OF 2009 MP. NO: 23365 OF 009
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased stay all further proceedings pursuant to the impugned proceedings bearing Rc.No.E3/2105/09, dated 2s-s-2oog issued by the 2nd Respondent-Joint collector in respect of the subject lands covered in o.s.No.79l200g, pending on the file of the Hon'ble Junior civil Judge, Narasampet, District warangal, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt G. AKUL REDDy, REPRESENTING SRI G. ANANDAM
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Gp FOR ASSIGNMENT
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.S & 6: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.17822 of 2OO9
ORDER
Sri G.Akul Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri G.Anandam, learned counsel for thepetitioner submits that cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication
dismissed as infructuous. No costs,
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any,
pending in this writ petition stand closed.
SD/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT GIS
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MP GJn,,-
HIGH COURT
DATED 23
1rl E srAf6
(
q
t
c o 1 B JAN 202[
*
5'r/,i':,tr --
ORDER
WP.No.17822 of 2009
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
6c4*a tr-,.
Sampangi Achamma @ Lachamma
District Collector, Warangal District
Joint Collector, Warangal
Revenue Divisional Officer, Narsampet
Tahsildar, Khanapur Mandal
Bhukya Laxma
J SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
