Dismissed

P. Janardhan Rao (died) per Lrs v. Special Grade Dy. Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer

Telangana HC19 Dec 2023WP/12113/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 read with Section 151 CPC for non-prosecution as the counsel reported inability to secure instructions from the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions closed. No costs awarded.

P. Janardhan Rao (died) per Lrs Vs Special Grade… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 12'113 OF 2009

¶7

Between:

¶8

P. Janardhan Rao (died) per Lrs, S/o.Omkaram, aged 54 years, Occ : Business, Ri/o.Flat No.5'12, Manju Vigneswara Towers, Yadav Nagar, Malkajgiri, Ranga ReddyDistrict.

¶9

P.Yani Wo. Late Janardhan Rao,

¶10

P. Anirudh S/o. Late Janardhan Rao,

¶11

Petitioners 2 and 3 are brought on record as Lrs of deceased 1st petitioner and R5 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 27-03-15 in WPMP.Nos.30262 and 11179 ot 2015.

¶12

.....PETITIONERS

¶13

AND

¶14

Special Grade Dy. Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer, Ranga Reddy District East Division, Goshamahal, Hyderabad.

¶15

Tahasildar, Keesara Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶16

A. Ratanlal Agarwal, S/o. M.P. Agarwal, Business, R/o. 10-3-3/28, East Manedpally, Secunderabad.

¶17

Mukesh Agarwal, S/o. R.L. Agarwal, Business, R/o. 10-3-3/28, East Marredpally, Secunderabad.

¶18

State of Telangana, rep. by its Secretary, Dept. of Revenue, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶19

(R5 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 27-03-15 in WPMP.No.'11179 of 201s)

¶20

.....RESPONDENTS

¶21

Petition Under Article 226 ot lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in

¶22

."7

¶23

the nature of Writ of [V'landamus declaring impugned orders in Appeal No.A2l137l2oo8 dated 2B-o7 -2oo8 of the l"trespondent, as illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same

¶24

t.A. NO: 1 0F 2009{wPMP. NO:156 30 0F 2009

¶25

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of orders in appeal No.A2l137l2o0g dt.28.7.2oog on the file of the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI A.RAVINDER REDDY

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 5 : Gp FOR REVENUE

¶28

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : SRI PRABHAKAR pERt

¶29

The Court made the following ORDER

¶30

;--7 ./'

¶31

HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE J. SREENIVAS RAO Writ Petition No. 12113 of 2OO9

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri D.Saval, learned counsel representing Sri A.Ravinder Reddy, Iearned counsel for the petitioners submits that inspite of his best efforts, he could not secure arry instructions from the petitioners to proceed with the matter on merits ald expressed his inability.

¶34

In view of the above submission, it appears that the petitioners are not having any interest to prosecute with the matter.

¶35

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs.

¶36

Pending rniscellaleor.rs petitions, if any, sha,ll

¶37

stand closed.

¶38

SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT GI //TRUE COPY//

¶39

SECTI N OFFICER

¶40

¶41

Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court forthe State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶42

One CC to Sri A.Ravinder Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶43

One CC to Sri Prabhakar Peri, Advocate IOPUCI 4. Two CD Copies SA GJP$*.

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 911212023

ORDER

WP.No.121 13 of 2009

1 E STATSi o
q z
oo 2 [ ,lA\ 2[2[ .\C) I
+'
+
+ oESpr-fC

¶49

DISMISSING THE W.P

¶50

FOR NON^_ PROSECUTION

¶51

WITHOUT COSTS.

¶52

P. Janardhan Rao (died) per Lrs v. Special Grade Dy. Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P. Janardhan Rao (died) per Lrs v. Special Grade Dy. Collector and Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s New Steel City Merchants Welfare Society, Vs The Secretary (Revenue)

D. Satyanarayana Vs The Tahsildar

Managing Committee Dargah Hzt. Khaja Syed Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

Mrs. Javariya Ali Vs Government of A.P.

Smt. P. Sarojini Devi, Vs Rev. Dept., Rep. by Its Prl. Sec. and Another

M/S I.O.U Projects(India ) Pvt. Ltd. and 2 Others Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer and 13 Others