Hyderabad Leather Work v. Visakhapatnam Steel Plant
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging termination of supply contract due to alleged sample non-conformity and malafide third-party procurement. Petitioner claimed violation of contract terms and Article 226. Court noted no interim stay was effective and closed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition closed as no further orders were necessary to be passed.
What the court decided
[32e6 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 15173 OF 2011
Between:
Hyderabad Leather Work, Rep. by its Prop. Tikamdas Tekwani, S/o. Late Shri Rochi Ram aged 71 years, Occ Business, H.No. 29, Chandra Nagar Colony, Rasoolpura, Secunderabad - 03.
- ...PETITIONER
AND
- 1 Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Rashtriya lspat Nigam Limited, Visakhapatnam, A.P.
- 2 The Sr. Manager (MM) Purchase, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant Rashtriya lspat Nigam Limited' Visakhapatnam' A P
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition questioning termination of contract for supply of gauntlets should be decided or closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hyderabad Leather Work, Rep. by its Prop. Tikamdas Tekwani
- respondent
Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited
- respondent
The Sr. Manager (MM) Purchase, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/15173/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court