The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 as infructuous, following the submission that the cause of action no longer existed.
Dismissal of the writ petition with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 J
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 14255 0F 2009
Between:
{r:. {rrllygAli, W/o. Md. Aliuddin Wasi, ased 41 years, Occ 407, Red Hills, Hyderabad. AND
Business, R/o.11-5.....PETITIONER
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned Notice File No. 8/637/2009, dated 08-07-2009 proposing to conduct survey and fixing the boundaries of Sy.No.58, Tandur Village and Mandal, R.R.District is illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction and set aside the same.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2009( WPMP.NO:18677 OF 20Og
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interam stay of all further proceedings pursuant to the Notice file no. 8163712009, dated 08-07-2009 issued by the 2nd Respondent, pending disposat of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI C.RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI N.VASUDEVA REDDY The Court made the following ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.14255 of 2OO9
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri L.Ravinder, learned counsel representing Sri C.Raghu, Iearned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed
ASS,srAfrDkftf'li{i* //rRUE coPY// _ sEcfloN oFrrcen
{
To
SA GJ
' l I
HIGH COURT
DATED:1911212023
ORDER
L4,
cr
rY, "+
/r ql.' v
tj a :t
o
s
o
\ ra
,J.
/# <br>*
c HcrH
WP.No.14255 ot 2009
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
U @c"\ 6w
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the survey notice survives for adjudication.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ali, W/o. Md. Aliuddin Wasi
Government of A.P.
The Mandal Surveyor, Tandur Mandal
Gore Miya
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
