Writ petition under Article 226 and Section 151 CPC regarding interference with petitioner's land rights was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33e3 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
wRrT PETTTTON NO.1317s OF 2022
Between:
Mr. Mohd. Ghouse, S/o. Mohd. Jani Miya, aged 51 years, Occupation: Business, Rl/o. H.No, 2-7. Hafeezpet Village, Serilingampally Mandal, R.R.District, Rep. by his DAGPA Holder, M/s. Mathrubhuumi lnfra, rep by its Managing Partner, Sri. Yaramada Yadagiri Reddy.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an Order, Direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with the raghts of the petitioner land bearing Survey No. 3O7lEtO, situated at Gajularamaram Village, Quthbullapur Mandal, District Medchal-Malkajgiri, owned and possessed by the Petitioner, and demanding the petitioner to secure orders from this Hon'ble Court, as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, unjust, contrary to the
provisions of the Act, and without any justification, and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with petitioner development without following due process of law.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with petitioner development over the land of the petitioner admeasuring Ac.5,00 Gts., in Part of Sy.No.3O7lElO, situated at Gajularamaram Village, Quthbullapur lt/andal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, pending final disposal of the main writ petition in this Hon'ble.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MADAS BHARATH CHANDRA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI M. HAMSA RAJ, S.C. FOR TSFC
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI N. SREEDHAR REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
a,
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF'JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRT JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
WRIT PE TTTION No.l3 175 of 2022
ORDER: (per the Hon'ble the ChiefJustice Alok Aradhe)
Mr. Madas Bharath Chandra, learned counsel appears
for the petitioner.
2 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this
Court to withdraw the Writ petition.
withdrawn.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REQTST]RAR V./
SECTION OFFICER
To,
MP
GJ
HIGH COURT
DATED:18 2023
1$e s TAr€
q
o 18 JAN 2024
L) 5
d+
*
t gO
,:s PAT c6
ORDER
WP.No.13175 of 2022
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
h ?t)4
Mr. Mohd. Ghouse
Telangana State Financial Corporation
The State of Telangana
Alok Aradhe
Anil Kumar Jukanti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
