The Writ Appeal filed by seed companies challenging a government memorandum was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellants with liberty to file a review petition.
The writ appeal was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a review petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3393 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
WRIT APPEAL NO..I059 OF 2023
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent preferred Against the Order dated 27-04-2023 in W.P.No.18458 ol 2022 on the file of the High Court.
Between:
...APPELLANTSM/RIT PETITIONERS
ANO
." RESPoNIDaN\TS
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the memorandum issued by the third respondent on 24.O4.2017 pending disposal of the writ appeal in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Appellants: SRI K.V. BHANU PRASAD, SENIOR COUNSEL REP. SRI KOTHAPALLT SAI SRI HARSHA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: SMT. B. KAVITHA YADAV, S.C. FOR CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SMT. C. VAN| REDDY, 3.C. FOR ICAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6: SRI BANDARI SHANKAR, AGP FOR AGRICULTURE
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
WRIT APPEAL No.1059 of 2023
JIIDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
I I
Mr. K.V. Bhanu Prasad, learned SBnior Counsel represents Mr. K. Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the appellants.
Ms. B. Kavita Yadav, learned Standing Counsel for
Central Government appears for respondent Nos.l to 3.
Mr. Bandari Shankar, leamed Assistant Govemment
Pleader for Agriculture appears for respondent Nos.5 and 6.
fact challenged before the learned Single Judge.
CJ&J^J W.A No 1059 ot - ,23
2
3. In view of aforesaid submission, the Writ Appeal ts
dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/.I. NAGALAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR
To,
SECTION OFFICER
MP
GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 o23
1 t\e SrAf6
q P
J
6)
1 1 JAN 2[2[
-!,
.t
*
t
l- ,l-aJ
JUDGMENT
WA.No.1059 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN ^/ITHOUT COSTS
@ Gqiu,
q-..^KS^
M/s. Surya Seeds Limited
M/s. Accurate Bio Tech Seed India (P) Ltd.
M/s. Shatavahan Bio Sciences Private Limited
M/s. Sun Seeds and Bio Sciences
The Union of India
The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee
ALOK ARADHE
ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
