In this intra-court writ appeal, the Telangana High Court dismissed the petition seeking to quash an order. The Court disposed of the appeal by granting the appellant liberty to approach other forums.
Liberty to the appellant to take recourse to remedy available under the law or file a civil suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33e3 ]
t
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SATURDAY, THESIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THECHIEF JUSTICEALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRIJUSTICEANIL KUMARJUKANTI
WRIT APP EAL NO.709 0F 2023
writ Appeal under clause15 of the Letters PatentPreferredAgainst orderDated 27t03t2)23 in W.P.No.42766ol 2022 on the file of the HighCourt'
Between:
The Primarv Fishermen CooperativeSociety Limited, Chamanpally -Village' D#r#;;''M""Ji'[pbtirpirrv oisirict, Rep.bv its President KumarapuRa.mulu' 5i;.' R;Ei;h,-iget auou[- i'a vears,Rvo l"i'No't-108,chamanpallvVillage' Dharmarlm Mandal,Peddapally District
...APPELLANT/WRITPETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
lA NO:'l OF 2023
Petition under section 5 of Limitation Act praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to condone the deray of 56 days in firing the above appear aggrieved by the order dt. 27-03-2023 of the Hon'ble High court passed in w.p.No. 42766 of 2022
Counsel for the Appettant: SRt Mr. VADLAKONDA RAVI KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos..l to 3 & 5: Ms. A. CHANDANA, GP FOR FISHERIES
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: cp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: -
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
-=-=
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRIJUSTICE ANIL KUMARJUKANTI
WRIT APPEAL No.709 of 2023
JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe.l
Mr. Vadlakonda Ravi Kumar, learned counsel appears for the appellant.
Ms. A. Chandana, learned counsel for respondent Nos.l,2,3 and 5.
II
W.P.No.42766 of 2022 preferred by the appellant has been dismissed on the ground that the same requires adjudication of disputed questions of fact.
for the appellant submits that the appellant be granted liberty
to take recourse to the remedy which may be available to the appellant under the Telangana Cooperative Societies Act, 1964, or may be permitted to avail of the remedy of filing a
civil suit.
CJ & JAIi.J \ A \o 709 of2023
2
4.lnviewofaforesaidsubmission,theappealisdisposed
of with theliberty to the appellant to take recourseto such
remedy asmaybe availableto it under the law'
Miscellaneousapplications, if any pending' shall stand
closed.There shall be no order as to costs'
s D/' c H.ro=JJffi=REH,t?HlH
//TRUE COPY// ci
SECTION OFFICER
To,
10.Two CD CoPies
MP
GJP s
HIGH COURT
DATED:1611212023
E STAT
1t<br>(
t
o 0 B JAN 2024
,:oz
9es pnrc
JUDGMENT
WA.No.709 ot 2023
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT APPEA1 WITHOUT COSTS
og's
N
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to dispose the intra-court writ appeal filed against an order dismissing a writ petition.
Whether to grant liberty to the appellant to seek remedies under other laws.
The Primary Fishermen Cooperative Society Limited, Chamanpally
The State of Telangana
The Commissioner of Fisheries
The District Collector, Peddapally
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Peddapally
The Assistant Director of Fisheries/District Fisheries Officer, Peddapally
Alok Aradhe
Anil Kumar Jukanti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
