The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition seeking declaration of illegal denial of promotion to Administrative Officer and consequential reliefs as infructuous upon counsel's submission.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33e3 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
SATURDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEIMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
wRlT PET|TION NO.9319 0F 2012
Between:
G.Jalandhar, S/o Thukkaiah, Court of the Senior Civil Judge Court, Peddapalty, Karimnagar District Rl/o H.No. 2-1 0-263, Jyothinagar Karimnagar.
...PETITIONER
AND
Address of the 3'd respondent is through District Court, Karimnagar.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ (i) declaring the order of the District Judge, Karimnagar letter Dis. No. 7548 dated 17.O9.2011 in not considering the promotion of the petitioner to the post of Administrative Officer as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of principles of naturaljustice and fairplay (ii) declaring the order Roc. No. 242312011-C1 dated 6.3.2012 of the 1st respondenton administrative side is illegal and in violation ofprinciples of naturaljustlce (iii)
consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled for promotion to the post of Administrative Officer on par with Sri D. Ramaswamy, Padmaiah duly setting aside the proceedings letter Dis. No. 7549 dated 17.9.2011 promoting the 3rd respondent as Administrative Offlcer on paper with all consequential benefits including the financial benefits.
NO: 1 OF 2012 MP. NO: 11787 OF 2012
Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Administrative Officer before considering hisjuniors by suspending order of District Judge, Karimnagar letter Dis. No. 75411 dated 17.09.201 1.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. ANURAG BAJPAL REPRESENTING Smt. K. UDAYA SRI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI Y. RAMA RAO, STANDING COUNSEL
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: --
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEFJUSTICE ATOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SHRIJUSTICE ANIL KUMARIUKANTI
Writ Petition No.93l9 of 2012
OR ER, (Per the Hon'bk the ChieJfuttice Alok Arudhe)
Mr. Anurag Rajpai, learned counsel rcpresents Ms. K.Udaya
Sri, learned couflsel flor the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject
matter has become infructuous.
In view of afloresaid submission, the Vrit Petirion is
dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending i[ any, stand
closcd
SD/.R. KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
9',
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
I One CCto Smt. K' UDAYA SRI' Advocate [OPUC]
2 One CCto SRIY' RAMA RAO' Standing Counsel[OPUC]
J Two CDCoPies
MP \qr GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1611212023
E S tA
of, vz
0 5 JAN 2[2[ c)
{+
*
s I AJ C
ORDER
WP.No.9l)19 of 2012
DISMISS!NG THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
sa#a #,F
G. Jalandhar
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
District Judge, Karimnagar
Sri A. Padmaiah
ALOK ARADHE
ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
