Disposed

Shriram General Insurnce Co. Ltd., and Another v. Revelli Srimathi and 7 Others

Telangana HC12 Jun 2023MACMA/2527/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This special application was disposed of after the underlying motor accident claim was settled via a Lok Adalat award on 11.02.2023. The High Court dismissed the appeal following the settlement, allowing the deposited compensation to be credited.

What did the court decide?

Disallowance of appeal and disposal of the MACMA based on Lok Adalat award settling the claim.

Shriram General Insurnce Co. Ltd., and… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

3215 ]

¶2

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD[

¶4

MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THRdi

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶7

M.A.C.M.A.N 0-2527 OF 2016

¶8

Appeal Under Section _173 of Motor Vehicles Act against the Order and Decree made in o.p.No.893 of 2012 aut"a iz.oi,.ioi6 on tne fire of the court of the [ff[Tj!;r.'"t"'^{Accident claimsrtior""r-"rl-prin"ipur -dirir[i"'J;;",} Between:

¶9

!
1..
t2.
4.
f3
/

ShriramGeneralInsu
10003E-B RCO,Industrial
RajasthanState
(PolicyNo,10oo3/31/L2I42
upto02l12l2Ol2)
ShriramGeneral Insurance-
KarimnagarBranch,abovg
bypass road,Karimnagarp
The RespondentsNo.2and.3
represented bytheir natural.
RevelliSrimathii.e.Responde
Co.
itapur
id
vLi
otors
gsh K
inors,
er and
,i;r-t
ag9.^sz,
ppellants/
ntNo.2&3r:
spondents/
::
....4
d
RevelliSrimathi,W/o.San
!ffitr,
years,Occ:Housewife,
RevelliKumaraswamy,S/o.1
years,Minor,
Revelli Devamma@Devakka
Ku
Raj
6
Revelli SaiKumar, S/o.San
year, Minor,
years,Occ:Household,
RevelliRajaiah,S/o.Ramai
Ni1,
lil
'ia
e
1
':l
t
sh
l]r
:j
7g..
ye
ii
t
.1.
AllareR/c.H.No.1,MallapurlVilfage
MandalinKarimnagarDi"tri"{.fi
ofD
.Petitioners
.1
11.
l,5.
:!
,
i

¶10

& to. \zalikuppala Suresh, s/o. Wa.ddera, Occ: Drive r of Ti I AP-28-Y-2861, R/o. I\4andal, Nalgonda District. :.: ,/7 iinown to the petitioner, Occ: beetring No. AP-28-Y-2861, .iH.No. 8-2.2 2 Durgabhavaninagar, Fi , -Hyderatia. t !t ,l.ii :i: B IFFKO TOKYO Gen. Insura i Retrrresenteci by its Branch M a. I(alimnagar. (Impleaded as. 1n I i'i ot.2.9-04-2O15\ i sponden ent No. 1 2^tl ,& 5^,. /. /

¶11

Counsel forthe Appeilants: SRl. K. AJYA KUMAR Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI A. KRUPADHAR REDDY

¶12

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶13

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶14

M.A.C.M.A.No.2527 of 2016

¶15

JUDCMENT:

¶16

-fhis appeal is filed by the appetlants - Insurance Company against the judgmcnt and decree dated 22.04.201 6 passed in O.P.No.893 of 2012 by the Chailman, Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal-cum-Principal District^Judge, Karirnnagar

¶17

On 31.01.2023. the mattcl was leferrcd to Lok Adalat in^view olthe letter datcd 25.01.2023 addressed by the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Authority. llydcrabad. The matter was settled before Lok Adalat^vide award dated I I .02.2023.

¶18

:1. In view ol-1hc award dated ll.()2.2023 passed by the Lok Adalat,^the

¶19

M.A.C.M.A is disposed of in terms of the award. No order as to costs.

¶20

Miscellancous applications pcnding, if any, shall stand closed.

¶21

SD/. G. SIREESHA ASS|ST4NT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// setclfolr oFFrcER

¶22

To, 1' The chairman, Motor Accident craims Tribunar-cum-principar District Judge, Karimnagar.

¶23

?. 9nu^{CC to SRt. K. AJAY_KUMAR,} Advocate 1OeUC1 3. One CC to SRt. A. KRUPADHAn neOOinO'voca-tJlOeUCJ

¶24

(Note: Enclosed Lok Adalat Award Copy)

4 Two CD Co ptes CHR

HIGH COURT

DATED:1210612023

JUDGMENT

MA0MA.No.2527 of 2016

¶30

r HE, SI^ 16
e
o
t
.J5
I
2 tt ,tlj[ 2{m L)
li
t
D6: sp,cvt)/
=-=^---z'

¶31

DISPOSING OF THE MACMA WITHOUT COSTS

¶32

b
rs(
s

¶33

BEFORE^{THE LOKADALAT} HIGH C OURT LEGAL^{SERVICESCOMMITTEE} (HIGH COU RT^{FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD)} [Under^{Seclion'19 of the Legol ServicesAulhorities Act,1987 (CentrolAcl)l}

¶34

Date: 11-0^2-2023

¶35

Present:1. Hon'ble^{Justice G' Sri Devi} (Former Judge'^{HighCo'rrtfor the stateof Telangana)} Chairman ,.. 2. Smt.^{S. KiranmaYee,Advocate'} i,,; I ,. , trt' 3. MemberSri Etavanatt^{Rajesh,Advocate'} ' ,,,,'. . .: i MACMA Member^{NO.2527 of 2016} t, (Before the^Hon'b le High^Court) AGAIN ST M.V.O. P.No.893^{of 2012} Tribunat-Cum-Prt'^District (On the fite of the^{Chairman,MotorVehi cteAccidentCtaims} Judge :^Karimnagar)

¶36

BETWEEN: T-. Shdram^{Generat lnsurance co Ltd ,} ' iijboii-g RCo, lndustriat Area, sitapura' Jaipur' Rajasthan state (Poticy No.10003^{131 117t470357valid} tJpto 0711212017\

¶37

Shriram^{General lnsuranceCompanyLimited'} -' Xi.imnugut Branch, above TATA Motors buitding Bypa* road,^{KarimnagarProPer'}

¶38

...Appellants/Respondent^{No'2 & 3}

¶39

AND

¶40

1 RevettiSrimathi,W/o.SanthoshKumar,age2SYears'Occ:Housewife 7 Revetli^{Kumaraswamy, S/o. SanthoshKumar' age 8 Years'Minor'}

¶41

3 Revetti Sai^{Kumar, S/o. SanthoshKumar,Age1 Year' Minor'}

¶42

4 Revetti^{Devamma@ Devakka, W/o' Rajaiah'age52 years'Occ:Househotd'} 5 ReVetti Rajaiah,^{5/o. Ramaiah, age 56 years'Occ: Nit'} The Respondents^{No.z and 3 are minors'}

¶43

n""*i"...i"abytheirnatUra[motherandnextfriend,

¶44

Revatli Srimathi^{i.e. Respondent No'1'}

¶45

At[ are R/o.^H.No.1 ,^{Mattapur Vittage of Dharmaram'}

¶46

Mandat in l(ilrimnagar^District.

¶47

...Respondents/petitioners

¶48

6 VarikuppaLa^{Suresh,5/o. Ramutu,age22 years'} w;Jd;; il' Driver of Tipper^{Lorry bearing No' AP-2.8-Y-2861} ' R/o. ougglyrtu^{Vittage Peayapetti, Mandat,NatgondaDistrict'}

¶49

7 Bathuta^{Ramutu,S/o. Narayana,age major,} 1ol {19ryn^t9^{the petitioner'---} A;,;;;;; '^{R/o' H'No'8-2-2e3/82'} "i^{iipperLorry u""t"i u"' '^P'28-Y-7861}

¶50

Durgabhavaninagar,^{Fitmnagar,Hyderabad'-} IFFKb TOKYo^{Gen. lnsuranceCompanyLimited,}

¶51

Ro.,resented bv its Branch^{Manager, Branch Office, Kanmnagar'} ti.ipt"ra"O^{asierorder in l.A'399/2015,} '^{Dt'29-04-2015)} ...Respondent/Respondent^{No'1'2 & 5}

¶52

Counset for'Appettant/^{lnsurance Company : Sri K'Ajay Kumar' Advocate} Counsel for^{Respondents/Petitioners : Sri Bodta Srinivas'Advocate/} Sri A. Pavan^{Kumar Advocate} Representative^{of lnsurance Company : iri K' Madhav Reddy, Deputy Manager (Legat)}

¶53

s.r-+

¶54

fu I^,'lir' i^'?h ! i..v:.-+-. I i-( I - -.$t I 'g: i- .:ii ,:.*! it .tti .-}I,' .'l}i i ;;; i'' '^:]:" :rj t,:il tt , ::,i l :&i I :-.l 1i I .,*i 'l;.t 'i-^: I. *.i ri .-1.!i i:;;':': .-.,, ti?i'

¶55

¶56

,;, This appeat havrng been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and ,/''^{afterhearlngthe Learned Counsel for thr: parties and atso the parties, the fottowing}

¶57

award is passed

¶58

AWARD

¶59

Compensation Awarded bythe Tribunal	The petit:onrsatlowedinpartawardingacompensation Rs.16,46,300/-(RupeesSixteenlakhsforty-sixthousandthre( hundredonly)topetitionerswithproportionatecostsand [email protected]%perannumfromthedateofthepetitiontittthe dateofactualdeposit.
Compensation Awarded (SetttementReached) intheLokAdalat.	TheClaimants/Respondentshave attended beforetheDLSA, Karimangarwhereintheyareidentifiedby theSecretary,DLSA, Karimnagar. TheDeputy ManagerofShriramGeneral lnsurance CompanyLimitedhasappearedbeforetheLokAdatatand reported compromise.TheAppettants/lnsurance Companyhas agreedtopayRs.12,00,000/-(RupeesTwetve [akhsonty)in additiontotheamount alreadydeposited.For which,the Respondents/Ctaimantsagreedtoreceivethesaidamount towardsfutIandfina[setttementoftheirctaim.Accordingty, thecompromiseis recordedandthe matteris settted before the LokAdatat, TheAppettants/lnsurance Company shattdeposittheabovesaid amountwithin(30) daysfrom thedateoireceiptofcopyofthe award.lntheeventofdefautt ordetayinmaking such deposit, theamountpayabteshatlcarry interest atJ2% perannumfrom the dateofdefautt.
Apportionmentof Compensation,tfany	The apportionmentamongtheRespondent/Petitioner/Ctaimant Nos.'lto5shatlbemadeintermsoftheAwardpassedin MVOP.No.893of2012bythe Tribunat.

Compensation Awarded
bythe Tribunal

The petit:onrsatlowedinpartawardingacompensation
Rs.16,46,300/-(RupeesSixteenlakhsforty-sixthousandthre(
hundredonly)topetitionerswithproportionatecostsand
[email protected]%perannumfromthedateofthepetitiontittthe
dateofactualdeposit.

Compensation Awarded
(SetttementReached)
intheLokAdalat.

TheClaimants/Respondentshave attended beforetheDLSA,
Karimangarwhereintheyareidentifiedby theSecretary,DLSA,
Karimnagar. TheDeputy ManagerofShriramGeneral lnsurance
CompanyLimitedhasappearedbeforetheLokAdatatand
reported compromise.TheAppettants/lnsurance Companyhas
agreedtopayRs.12,00,000/-(RupeesTwetve [akhsonty)in
additiontotheamount alreadydeposited.For which,the
Respondents/Ctaimantsagreedtoreceivethesaidamount
towardsfutIandfina[setttementoftheirctaim.Accordingty,
thecompromiseis recordedandthe matteris settted before the
LokAdatat,
TheAppettants/lnsurance Company shattdeposittheabovesaid
amountwithin(30) daysfrom thedateoireceiptofcopyofthe
award.lntheeventofdefautt ordetayinmaking such deposit,
theamountpayabteshatlcarry interest atJ2% perannumfrom
the dateofdefautt.

Apportionmentof
Compensation,tfany

The apportionmentamongtheRespondent/Petitioner/Ctaimant
Nos.'lto5shatlbemadeintermsoftheAwardpassedin
MVOP.No.893of2012bythe Tribunat.

¶60

Addit'ional Direction (s)

¶61

The Appettant(s) is/are e.titted to the refund of court Fee paid in this appeat.

¶62

2 The amount atready depcsited by the rnsurance Company sha[[ be given credit to.

¶63

3 !oon. such deposit by the rnsurance Company, the major ctaimant/ Respondent/ Petitioner Nos..l, 4 & 5 are permitted to wi[hdr;w th6ir respective ,har" ariounts u, per the orders and apportionment to be made by the Tribun;t/corrt a"to*. Tt" iiir" of minor craimant/Rcspordent/petitioner Nos. / a i ir-.utt ue ffi i;firJ i"p"riii" any Nationatized Bank titt they attatn majority.

¶64

In token of consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counsel have signed this avrard in our presence.

¶65

ln terms ci the compromise arrived at between the parties, this case stands disposed of.

¶66

<. ' 12- I -[-L-^,J,,(^-

¶67

--.1r.-

¶68

.,:]
)
/'.
t (s)
Respon den
Appellant (s)
R"US,E,
R lii,el Ot \ t\ ':1:' / ^rrl'
":.
R'9+es
',,..O 1
" i'.S*,6\o*-".,'
i ii,.'r"$.
:':1
1
r t-?- cf - fi)-x-vcr5
J
Ns
ondent (s)
counsel for the A ellant (s) Counsel for the Res
=-MEMB ER M ER
CHAIRMAN

Shriram General Insurnce Co. Ltd., and Another v. Revelli Srimathi and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shriram General Insurnce Co. Ltd., and Another v. Revelli Srimathi and 7 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bajaj Allianz Gen Ins Co. Ltd., Hyderabad Vs Munjala Mallesham, Warangal Dist and 2 Others

Smt v. Pochamma Vs Pentaiah

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs Mrs. S.B. Vedavalli

Reliance General Insurance Co.Ltd Vs M.Srikanth and Another

Reliance General Insurance Co., Ltd., Vs Katravath Kodandapani and 2 Others

Mr. S.v.Murali Vs Margadarsi cHit Fund Limited