Dismissed

Bajaj Allianz Gen Ins Co. Ltd., Hyderabad v. Munjala Mallesham, Warangal Dist and 2 Others

Telangana HC9 Jun 2023MACMA/3705/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court closed Appeal No. 3705 of 2014 filed by an insurance company against an MACT order. The matter was referred to a Lok Adalat where the appellant withdrew the appeal, leading to the High Court dismissing the appeal as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; principal judgment and decree of MACT confirmed; amounts payable by Insurance Company.

Bajaj Allianz Gen Ins Co. Ltd… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^321s ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE^{G.RAOHA RANI}

¶6

M,A.C.M. A. NO: 3705 OF 2014

¶7

Appeal under Section 173 of Motor^{Vehicles Act againstthe Order anddecree} in MVOP No.1645 of 2007 daled 51512014 on the^{file of the Court of the Chairman,} Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal^(l Additional District^{Judge,) Warangal.}

¶8

Between:

¶9

Bajaj Allianz General lnsurance Company Ltd., Rep.by its^{Manager,Legal} Department, Far East Plaza, ll Floor, Opp: TATA Motors, Liberty Road, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad.

¶10

...APPELLANT/ RESPONDENT NO.2 AND

¶11

Munjala Mallesham, S/o Kotilingam, Aged about 53 years, Occ: Toddy tipper, Fyo.Ellanthakunta Village, Jammikunta Mandal, Karimnagar District, Presently residing at Kumarpally, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.

¶12

.....Respondent No.1/ Petitioner No.'l

¶13

Nalla Ram Reddy, S/o Sanjeeva Reddy, aged 58^years, Occ: Owner of crime vehicle, R/o. 1-9-1154, Shankara Nagar, Postal Colony, Hanamkonda, Warangal District.

¶14

Raghava Reddy J., S/o.Venkat Reddy, R/o.2-7-537lA, Excise Colony, Subedari, Hanamkonda, Warangal District. (Respondent No.3 is added as per orders in-lA No.456/2013, dated 2411012013)

¶15

...RES'.NDENTS2&3/pETrroNERS2&3

¶16

MACMAMP. NQ: 5123 OF 2014

¶17

Petition under Section 1 51 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Judgment and Decree dated 05-05-2014 made in O.P. No.1645 of 2007 on the file of the chairman MACT-cum I Additional District Judge, warangal including all further proceedings in E.p.No.62 of 2014

¶18

For the Appellant : SRI A.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, Advocate

¶19

Forthe Respondent No.1 : SRI K.BUCHI BABU, Advocate

¶20

For the Respondent No.3 : SRI C.HARI PREETH, Advocate

¶21

The Court delivered the following : JUDGMENT

¶22

TH I., HO No Ti R,A ItI- [, I)R.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶23

\I. .( .\1.{.No.3705 ot20ll

¶24

JIJDCM!iNI':

¶25

lhis appr'al is lrlccl b1 rrre rrppcllant - Insurancc Company against thc judgrncnt and decrcc dated 05.05 101.1 passed in O.P.No.l645 ol 2014 by the (-'hairrnan, Motor z\ccidenrs ('l.rirn'fribunal-cum-l Additional District Judge, Waranpal

¶26

l. Orr 09.01.101 l. thc nrattcr- rr r: r'e lbncd to l..ok Adalat in view of the lelter dated 06.02.201.1 addrcss,--d b_r thc Sccrerary, High Court L-egal Services Authoritl , FIlderrrbatl. ,\s pel rhi.rrvard dated 11.02.2023, the learned counsel lor the appellant had withdra\,n rhe rUrpeal

¶27

In view o1-the rvithcirarval ol'tlre rnatter before the Lok Adalat, this appeal

¶28

is closed. No order ils 10 costs

¶29

Miscellaneous applications^{prnding, if any, shall stand closed}

¶30

¶31

¶32

Sd/-A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR //TRUE coPY// cn) SECTION OFFICER

¶33

The chairman,^{Motor AccidentsclaimsTribunal -l AdditionalDistrictJudge'} Warangal.^{(with records)}

¶34

2 o* C6 to sri A.Ramakiishna^{Reddy,Advocate} [OPUC] 3 One CC to Sri K.Buchi^{Babu, Advocate} [OPUC] 4 One CC to Sri C.Hari Preeth,^Advocate [OPUC] 5 Two CD Copies

¶35

(Lok Adalat Award copy enclosing herewith)

HIGH COURT

DATED:09/06/2023

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.3705^{of 2014}

¶43

E ',.--_.-..
\ ar^'':'
\ w' -^'-t'.'; ,.
'r'\i
:) I b IlJr2m :l;
.t'- _,'
//,

CLOSING THE^MACMA.

4
6 ?3

EEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERAEAD.

¶49

[Under^{Section l9 of lhe} tegol^{Services Authorities} Acl,^{1987 (Centrol Act)]}

¶50

Date;11-02-2023

¶51

Present:1 . Hon'ble Justice G.Sri Devi

¶52

iAi ,i4';.,)i::.
',;_l <br>ttrr [: t
,:. ;

¶53

(Former Judqe, High Court for the State of Tetangana) Chairman

¶54

Smt. S. Kiranmayee, Advocate, Member

¶55

3.Sri Etavanatt Rajesh, Advocate, Member

¶56

illAClrtA. No. 3 7O5 of 2O1 4

¶57

(Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶58

AGAINST

¶59

M.V.O.P.No. 1645 of 2OOl

¶60

(On the fite of the Chairman, Motor Vehicles Accidents Ctaims Tribunat (l-Additionat District Judge, Warangat)

¶61

Between:

¶62

Bajaj Attianz Genera[ lnsurance Co. Lld., 6?:tl Rep. by its Manager, Legal Depairtment', Far East Plaza, Il Ftoor, Opp: TATA Motors Liberty Road, Himayath. N?_!g.[,,,,H,yderaUaO.

¶63

....Appettant/ Respondent No.2

¶64

AND

¶65

Munjala Mattesham, S/o. Kotitingam Aged about 53 years, Occ: Toddy tapper, R/o. Etlanthakunta Viltage,

¶66

¶67

Jammikunta Mandat, Karimnagar District, Presentty residing at Kumarpatly, Hanamkonda, WarangaI District.

¶68

.... Respondent No.1 / Petitioner No.1

¶69

Natta Ram reddy, S/o. Sanjeeva Reddy, Aged 58 years, Occ: Owner of crime vehicte, Rlo. 1-9-1154, Shankara Nagar, PostaI Cotony, Hanamkonda,

¶70

WarangaI District.

¶71

Raghava Reddy J., S/o. Venkat Reddy, age: not known, Rl o. 7-7 -537 / A, Excise Cotony, Subedari, Hanamkonda, WarangaI District. (Respondent No.3 is added as per orders in

¶72

1.A.No.4561201 3, dated 24-10-201 3l

¶73

.... Respondents 2'& 3/ Pe ioners 2 3

za: -)

I t

AWARD

This is an appeal^{fited by the appettant/ lnsurance Company'}

¶81

2.TheLearnedCounselfortheAppet[ant/lnsuranceCompanyrepresentedthat t.he tnsurance^{Companyis withdrawlngthe appealfitedby it'}

¶82

l. The said representation^{is recorded and the appeat is dismissedas withdrawn'} confirming^{the.ludgment and decreeof the Court/Trrbunat below'The} amount if any^{remaining unpaid to the ctaimant(s)shatt be paid by the} lnsurance Company^{within one month from the date of receiptof the award'} atong with^interest.

¶83

4_ The ResDondent^{/ Petitioneris permitted to withdrawthe entire amount.} S. if,i, awIiO^{shatt be subjectto verification of cross appeat/crossobjection, if} any, fited by^{the Resiondents, o[herwisethe parries are ar [iberty to appty} for recatt of this^{Order'/Award.}

¶84

Court fee^{paid on tHis;appeat sha[t be refunded'}

¶85

No costs.

¶86

ii ftr &FiAltxE Garnl lmurr Co. [6.
t,t
)
T 6ignrlory
f'
Appettant / Respondent No.2
lnsurance ComPanY
[i'
(:v l(iir.
ii
\y l:
CHAIRMAN t|,f R ER
[. :
i,
rhe c tee)
i)
$
a
Ii 4
,r
l1r
i:'., ; .-'

Bajaj Allianz Gen Ins Co. Ltd., Hyderabad v. Munjala Mallesham, Warangal Dist and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bajaj Allianz Gen Ins Co. Ltd., Hyderabad v. Munjala Mallesham, Warangal Dist and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jan Shah Vs P.Venkata Raoand Ors.

Midde Yellaiah Vs Dr.N.Pulla Reddy

N.Ramesh Kumar Vs Bm.,Sbi.,Balanagar,Rr Dist and 2 Ors.

Smt v. Pochamma Vs Pentaiah

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs Mrs. S.B. Vedavalli

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Gaikwad Pushpa and 5 Others