Dismissed

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Mrs. S.B. Vedavalli

Telangana HC9 Jun 2023MACMA/1831/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This miscellaneous application for execution was disposed of after the High Court matter was referred to Lok Adalat. The parties reached a compromise, and the court disposed of the appeal in terms of the Lok Adalat award.

What did the court decide?

The appeal was disposed of in terms of the Lok Adalat award recording a compromise between the parties.

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

'; I l

¶2

HIGH COURT^{FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶3

FRIDAY,THE^{NINETHDAYOF JUNE} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENWTHREE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{DR. JUSTICEG.RADHA RANI}

¶6

MACMA^{NO.183 1 0F 2015}

¶7

Appeal filed^{under Section 173of M'V Act'aggrievedby the order and} decree iated^{11.06.2014 made in MVOP No 84 OF 2013'on the file of the Court} r noditional Chief^{Judge, City civil Court' Secunderabad'} "iit"-xiVf

¶8

Between:

¶9

tilg:3,:t','$l:,'3f^{Ff A'"1t11'R::3:ffi:!X'1""?#3':tiE"HolT'"n}

¶10

.. APPellanUResPondent

¶11

AND

¶12

1 'i;";;ir';Rk; Mrs S.B.Vedavalli E;ibir'ro.^Wo oo,^{late Sarvesham Himanshu Bhushanam Occ:} n t to. 8-7 -17 1 -2o, Mvthrivan colonv old Bowenpally,^{Secunderabad.}

¶13

2 It/ls. Praveen Sri^{D/o late Sarvesham Himanshu Bhushanamocc: Prviate} H. t t o..a -t^-'t t t^{-zo, Mvthri van col onv ol d}

¶14

E';i;,Jr.li*^"nyJ ij^{r-oi -Nti'oe} BoweripallY,^{Secunderabad.}

¶15

.. ResPondents/Petitioners

¶16

ACM MP No¹⁵ of 2015

¶17

Petition under^{Section151 of C P C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the^{Memorandum of Grounds of Petition, the High Court may be pleased} io?u"i ,i.v^{oilxecutionof the Judgment and Decreeof the court of the xxvll} noiiti*.r dni"f^{Judge,city civit corirt at secunderabad dated11.06.2014made} in-frlrOp No. 84^{of 2013 pending disposal of the above MACMA'}

¶18

Counsel for the^{Appellant(s): Sri ThoomSrinivas, Advocate}

¶19

Counsel for^{the Respondents: Ms:P' Rajeswari, Advocate}

¶20

The court delivered^{the followingJUDGMENT:}

¶21

¶22

¶23

THE HON()URABLE DR..IUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶24

M.A.C.l\I.A.No. I 83 I of 201 5

¶25

JTIDGMENT:

¶26

'['his appeal is liled by the appellanr aggrieved by the order and decree datcd ll .06.2014 passed in M./.(1.P.No.84 o1 2013 by rhe XXVII Additional ChielJudge, City Ci.,,il Court, Secunderabad.

¶27

On 3L0l.2021. the matter'\as relerred to Lok Adalat in view olthe letter

¶28

dated 25.0 I .202i a,ldressed bl the Secretary, I ligh Cour.t Le gal Services

¶29

Authority, Hyderabad. The matter ivas settled betbre Lok Adalat vide award dated I I .02.2023.

¶30

[n view of thr: award dated ]1.02.2023 passed by the Lok Adalat, rhe

¶31

M.A.C.M.A is dispos,ed of in terms of the award. No order as to costs.

¶32

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shallstand closed

¶33

Sd/-MOHD.SANAU LLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (b SECTION OFFICER

¶34

To,

¶35

The XXVII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad.^(with records)

¶36

One CC to MR.^r.Rajeswari Advocate^(OPUC)

¶37

One CC to Mr. Thoom Srinivas, Advocate^(OPUC)

¶38

Two CD Copies

¶39

Copy to : Photo copy of Award passed in Lok Adalat enclosed herewith.

¶40

/a,ot $*

¶41

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT l'{lGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COM,IIITTEE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD.

¶42

¶43

[Under^{Seclion l9 of the LegolSeryicer Aufhoritles} Acl,^{I987 (Cenhol} Act)l

¶44

Date:11-02-2023

¶45

Present:1. Hon'ble Smt. Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy

¶46

(Ju€e, High Cou.t for the State of Tel.n8.na) Chairman

¶47

SER
;
'Hffi
t
stshd

¶48

Sri Sodumu Nagesh Reddy, Advocate, .Member

¶49

Smt. D. Madhavi, Advocate,

¶50

Member

¶51

[rACA{A.NO. 1 831 of 201 5 (Before the Hon'ble High Court)

¶52

AGAINST

¶53

M.V.O.P No. 84 of 2013

¶54

(On the fite of the )fiVll Addt. Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad)

¶55

Between:

¶56

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Rep. by its Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, RTC Cross Roads, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.

¶57

¶58

....Appellant/Respondent

¶59

AND

¶60

Mrs. S.B. Vedavatli, W/o. Late Sarvesham Himamshu Bhushanam, Aged 45 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. Ptot No.66, H.No.8-7-171-20; Mythrivan Cotony Otd Bowenpalty, Secunderabad.

¶61

Ms. Praveen Sri, D/o. Late Sarvesham Himanshu Bhushanam, Aged 21 years, Occ: Pvt. Employee, R/o. Ptot No.66, H. No. 8-7- 1 71^-20, Mythrivan Cotony Otd Bowenpalty, Secunderabad.

¶62

..Respondents/Petltioners

¶63

CounseI for Appeltant/TSRTC : Sri N.Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate CounseI for Respondents/Petitionersfor Respondents/PetitionersRespondents/Petitioners : Smt. P. Rajeswari, Advocate/ Sri C.Venugopal Reddy, Adocate

¶64

CounseI for Respondents/Petitionersfor Respondents/PetitionersRespondents/Petitioners

¶65

Representative of TSRTC

¶66

: Sri P.N.M.Chary, Law Officer

¶67

This appeat having been referred for settlement before this Lok Adatat and after

¶68

hearing the Learned Counse[ for the parties and also the parties, the foltowing award is passed:

¶69

¶70

¶71

Compensation Aw:rrded bytheTribunal	AWARD Rs.19,33,780/-(RupeesNineteen lakhsthirty-l thousandsevenhundredandeightyonty)w, [email protected]%perannun. fromthedateofpetitiontitlreatization.
Compensation Awarded (SetttementReached) intheLokAdatat.	BoththepartiespresentbeforetheLokAdatatand theyreportedcompromise.TheRespondents/ Petitioners haveagreedtoreceive an amount of Rs.16,43,000/- (RupeesSixteen [akhs forty-three thousandonty)withreducedinterest@6%per annumfrom thedateofpetitionti[[reatizationand TSRTChasatsoagreedtopaythesameasfuttand fina[setttement.Accordingly,Compromiseis recordedandthematterissettled. TheAppeltant/TSRTC shattdeposittheabovesetrled amountwithintwo(2)monthsfromthedateof receiptofAward copyafterdeductingtheamount thatwasdepositedifany.
ApportionmentofCompensation, ifany	TheapportionmentbetweentheRespondent/ PetitionerNos.1and2shaltbe madeintermsofthe AwardpassedinOP.No. 84of2013bytheTribunat.

Compensation Aw:rrded
bytheTribunal

AWARD
Rs.19,33,780/-(RupeesNineteen lakhsthirty-l
thousandsevenhundredandeightyonty)w,
[email protected]%perannun.
fromthedateofpetitiontitlreatization.

Compensation Awarded
(SetttementReached)
intheLokAdatat.

BoththepartiespresentbeforetheLokAdatatand
theyreportedcompromise.TheRespondents/
Petitioners haveagreedtoreceive an amount of
Rs.16,43,000/- (RupeesSixteen [akhs forty-three
thousandonty)withreducedinterest@6%per
annumfrom thedateofpetitionti[[reatizationand
TSRTChasatsoagreedtopaythesameasfuttand
fina[setttement.Accordingly,Compromiseis
recordedandthematterissettled.
TheAppeltant/TSRTC shattdeposittheabovesetrled
amountwithintwo(2)monthsfromthedateof
receiptofAward copyafterdeductingtheamount
thatwasdepositedifany.

ApportionmentofCompensation,
ifany

TheapportionmentbetweentheRespondent/
PetitionerNos.1and2shaltbe madeintermsofthe
AwardpassedinOP.No. 84of2013bytheTribunat.

¶72

Additional DirectionOi

¶73

The Appettant is entitled to the refund of Court Fee paid in this appeat.

¶74

The amount atready deposited by the TSRTC, if any, shatt be given credit to.

¶75

On such deposit by the TSRTC, the Respondent/petitioner/Ctaimant Nos.1 and 2 are ltermitted to withdraw their respective share amounts as per the apportionment to be made by the Tribunat.

¶76

ln token of consent for the above setttement and award, the parties and their counsel have signed this award in our presence,

¶77

ln terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties, this case stands disposed of.

¶78

5 ^{^Jl^

¶79

f\ActrtA, tq3 tlkt;
"td
I '^.
,n
@
.Y. TQI,:
?
Appellant (s) Respondent (s)
(
SB Ve&L*v^tL
,l
(ra-
,ii,t,ilffi:il
IJW urr --
$fttQ; $wBtuvan' HYo'
l
Counsel for the Appellant (s) Counsel for the Res dent (s)
>..
Erl-14._
MEnseH TAEMBER
.,^d-
HICH COI.|RT
elo(ffit6rl )

-+.t-
I
:
ooQ aso !e
pur.fii pr.v&n. R.d6y
l)tn * j.ra/ y6u d od,t t$!
l. Femate
3302 5764 to86
trf:''|, - $ i!. nr5$ usr6

¶84

":"""'.XA\ t,o'C

¶85

Od;$r w/cts t6{ e5.l AdftBr: tJO PrJltiti of ).tog/a/1, rqa P.rtul Nlddy. !t00/&1. ?55 sa 5!<d. rd_,€ l(.a[ur Si.Illt Ft ta.l!a, ru{. at.dc.,6l XofiJr, KvRarqaarrdr. oo6 i/lt, sooor8 K6l!l{rr. 50m7r Aadtn P,r6ah

¶86

3392 6764 {096

¶87

a E

¶88

(p.1^ 1 J"4^V?ru* . \Jowk. C $^@t1' /\r ( ^czlfu/

HIGH COURT

DATED:09.06.2023

JUDGMENT

MACMA.No.1831 of 2015

¶93

1rr E SrAIA Q3
(
o,J ? $ l\Jt ?$tl ?!/
.-
t
::9

¶94

DISPOSING THE MACMA IN TERMS OF LOK ADALAT.

¶95

'v2
u

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Mrs. S.B. Vedavalli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation v. Mrs. S.B. Vedavalli

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jan Shah Vs P.Venkata Raoand Ors.

Midde Yellaiah Vs Dr.N.Pulla Reddy

N.Ramesh Kumar Vs Bm.,Sbi.,Balanagar,Rr Dist and 2 Ors.

Bajaj Allianz Gen Ins Co. Ltd., Hyderabad Vs Munjala Mallesham, Warangal Dist and 2 Others

Smt v. Pochamma Vs Pentaiah

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd., Vs Gaikwad Pushpa and 5 Others