Arya Vyshya Sanghamu v. Konda Veera Shiva Prasad and 6 others
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court closed three civil revision petitions against election orders, noting that previous court directions had resulted in the handover of records to the newly elected committee, leaving no cause for further action.
What did the court decide?
Civil revision petitions closed; no order as to costs.
What the court decided
[3208 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREI
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 831 839 840 0F 2023
Petition under Article 227 ot the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated27.01.2O23 in Election O.p. No. 830 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge, Nizamabad
Between:
- 1 Arya Vyshya€anghgmu, Nizamabad (lnduQ, represented by its president, Uppalancha, Bhumalingam S/o. Durgaiah, Age. 71 years, R/o. Near Saibaba I emple, Namdevwada, Nizamabad.
- Gajawada H_anmanth Rao, S/o.pandarinath, Age. 61 years, Occ.9overnmentService, Secretary to Arya VysyaSanghim,Nizaniabad'(lndui), R/o. Radha Associates, Marwadigally, Niziniabad'
...REVISION PETTTTONERSTRESPONDENT NOs. 1 AND 2
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petitions against the election orders require further adjudication.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Arya Vyshya Sanghamu, Nizamabad
- petitioner
Gajawada Hanmanth Rao
- respondent
Duddelli Ravichandra Gupta
- respondent
Muthyam Vardhendra Gupta
- respondent
Katkam Chiranjeevi Rao
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRP/840/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court