Petitioner challenged an order enhancing her monthly maintenance from Rs.500 to Rs.3,000 claimed from the date of application. Held that enhancement claims effect from the order date only. Dismissed with no merits found.
Revision petition dismissed; maintenance order dated 29.08.2009 remains intact.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY THE TWENry FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO:1081 OF2010
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 3gll4O1 of CrpC against the Order dated 29.08.09 made in Crl.M.P.No.1104 ot 2OOB in M.C.No. 13 of 1998 on the file of the Addl- lvletropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of JHCBB case-cumAddl. Family Court-cum-XXlll Addt. Chief Judge, Hyderabad
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENT
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRt. p KRISHNA REDDY
counset for the Responouflfl 'Qi.ro"onu Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
(
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1O81 of 2O1O
ORDER:
This Crimrnal Revision Case is filed against the Order of the trial Court dated 29.08.2009 in M.P.No.11O4 of 2008 in M.C.No.13 of 1998
r
2
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
SdI M. RAMANAKRISHNA DEPUTYREGISTRAR G
//TRUE coPY//
sEcrtoN oFFtcER
To,
\I IH, Ig_. :3l'&"*$ AA
I
t i II I
HIGH GOURT
DATED: 2410312023
ORDER
i/,
: 1 $iAY ?[?]
ll '-'
CRLRC.No.1081 of 2010
TIIE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE
IS DISMISSED
4
@q'
a
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a criminal revision is maintainable seeking to modify an order enhancing monthly maintenance from Rs.500 to Rs.3,000 per month.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to enhanced maintenance retrospectively from the date of filing the application in the underlying proceeding.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt Sharada Bai
T. Kishan Singh
The State of Andhra Pradesh
P. Sri Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
