Disposed

Arya Vyshya Sanghamu v. Duddelli Ravichandra Guptha

Telangana HC6 Apr 2023CRP/831/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of three civil revision petitions filed against election orders. Holding that elections were conducted and results announced under a previous court order requiring record handover, the Court found no cause for further adjudication and closed the petitions.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petitions No. 831, 839, and 840 of 2023 are closed with no order as to costs.

Arya Vyshya Sanghamu Vs Duddelli… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁰⁸ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREI

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA

¶6

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 831 839 840 0F 2023

¶7

Petition under Article 227 ot the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated27.01.2O23 in Election O.p. No. 830 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge, Nizamabad

¶8

Between:

¶9

1 Arya Vyshya€anghgmu, Nizamabad (lnduQ, represented by its president, Uppalancha, Bhumalingam S/o. Durgaiah, Age. 71 years, R/o. Near Saibaba I emple, Namdevwada, Nizamabad.

¶10

Gajawada H_anmanth Rao, S/o.^pandarinath, Age. 61 years, Occ.9overnment^{Service, Secretary to Arya VysyaSanghim,Nizaniabad'(lndui),} R/o. Radha Associates, Marwadigally, Niziniabad^'

¶11

...REVISION PETTTTONERSTRESPONDENT NOs. 1 AND 2

¶12

AND

¶13

Duddelli Ravichandra Gqptfra, S/o. Raja Mouli, Aged. 46 years Occ._ Business, R/o. Flat No. 203, Sai Gupta He(7hts, Vinaya[nagar, Niiamabad.

¶14

Muthyam Vqrrender_Guptha, S/9 Gangaiah, Aged 46 years, Occ.- Business, Ri/o. Beside Barsing Baba Temple, Gajulpet, Nizlamabad

¶15

Palthi Venkata Ramulu Guptha, S/o_Raja Veeraiah, Aged 49 years, Occ.Business, R/o. Beside Barsing Baba Temile, Gajulpei, Nizamabaf .

¶16

Nagamalla_Sathyanarayana Guptha, S/o. Bhumaiah, Aged 60 years, Occ _ Business, Rl/o. Near Devidas Hospital, Kasbagally, Nizarn?bad.

¶17

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶18

S [glfqry C_hir?njeevi_Rao, S/o. Not known, Aged. 56 years, Occ.- Teacher, R/O. Manik Bhavan School, Shivajinagar, Nizamabad.

¶19

Vish.wanatham -Srinivas, S/o. Gangaiah, Aged. 59 years. Occ.- Business, R/o. H. No. 6-26-158, Gurbabadi Road, Nizamabad.

¶20

Boolgup-aily Mallesh, S/o. Lachaiah, Aged.51 years, Occ.- Business, R/o. H. No.7-3-241, Gunj road, Nizamabad.

¶21

8 Siddamshetty Vijay Kumar, S/o Jagadishwer,^{Aged. 51 years, Occ. Business,} R/o H. No. 1-13-40419, Vinayaknagar,^Nizamabad.

¶22

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶23

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section¹ 51^{CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the High Cou(may be pleasedto} stay operation of^{impugned commonjudgment and decree daled 27 .01.2023in} Election oP No. 830 of^{2012 on th6 file of the lAdditionalDistrict Judge.} Nizamabad^{pending disposal of the civil Revision Petition in the interest of} justice

¶25

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶26

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the High court maybe pleasedto} stay the^{proposed election notification dated 06.03.2023rssuedby the alleged} Ad-Hoc Committee^{of the society pending disposal of the (lrvil RevisionPetition} in the interest of^justice

¶27

Counsel for the Petitioners:^{SRl.KASIBHATLA SAAKETH}

¶28

Counsel for the Respondents^{'t to 4: SRl. ALETI SRINIVAS}

¶29

Counsel for the^{Respondents 6 to 8: Sri. R. ANURAG}

¶30

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶31

CIVIL REVISION^{PETIT ION NO: 839 OF 2023}

¶32

Petition under Article^{227 of lhe constitutionof lndiaaggrievedby the} judgment and decree daled27.01 .2023 in^{ElectionO.P. No 887 of 2012 on the} file of the Court of the I Additional^{DistrictJudge,Nizamabad}

¶33

Between:

¶34

1 Arya Vyshya Sanghamu, Nizamabad (lndur), represented by its President, Uppalancha, Bhumalingam S/o. Durgaiah, Age. 71 years, R/o. Near Saibaba Temple, Namdevwada, Nizamabad

¶35

2 Qajawada^{HanmanthRao, S/o. Pandarinath, Age 61 years,Occ.} Government Service, Secretary lo Arya Vysya Sanghah, Nizamabad 1tndu4, R/o. Radha Associates, Marwadigally, Nizamabad.^-

¶36

...REVlSlgN PETITIONERS/RESPONDENT Nos.^.t and 2

¶37

AND

¶38

Chanda Laxminarayana, S/o. Mallaiah, Aged. 73 years. Occ. Business, R/o H. No. 6-2434, Subhashnagar, Nizamabad.

¶39

Konda Pavan Kumar S/o. Veerashankar, Aged. 4,1 years, Occ. Business, R/o Trimurthy Enterprises, Devi Road, Nizamabad.

¶40

P-asunuri Shiva Kumar, S/o. Narayana , Aged.47 years, Occ.Business, R/o. Mahan Apartments, Vinayaknagar, Nizama6ad.

¶41

Chenn^a Karthik Kumar,.S/o...Ravinder, Aged.33 years, Occ.Business, R/o. H. No. 2-3-66, Bhagwangally, Nizamabad.

¶42

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶43

K.atkam chiranjeevi Rao, s/o..Not known, Aged.56 years, occ. Teacher, R/o. Manik Bhavan Shivajinagar, Nizamabad.^-

¶44

Vishwanatham_Srinivas, S/o Gangaiah, Aged. Sg years, Occ. Business, Rio H. No. 6-26-158, Gurbabadi noad,-Nizaina6ad.

¶45

' R::iq!!fl{ Biil??!;l'&,,!X."l;#' Ased 51 vears, occ Business, R/o H

¶46

Siddamshetty Vijay Kuma.r, S/o. Jagadishwer, Aged 51 years. Occ. Business, Rl/o. H. No. 1-1340419, Vinayaknaj'ar, ttizamlOiJ.

¶47

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶48

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶49

Petition under section^',l51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of the operation of impugned common judgment and decree dated 27.o1.2023 in Etection op No. BB7 ot 2012 on the fite of the I Additional District Judge, Nizamabad pending disposal of the civil Revision petition in the interest of^justice.

¶50

IANO:2OF2 023

¶51

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay the proposed erection notification dated 06.03.2023 issued by the aleged

¶52

Ad-Hoc committee of the society pending disposal of the civil Revision petition in the interest of justice.

¶53

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt. KASIBHATLA SAAKETH

¶54

Counsel for the Respondents No: 6 to 8: SRI R. ANURAG

¶55

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶56

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 840 OF 2023

¶57

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 27.01 .2023in Election O.p. No 871 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge, Nizamabad

¶58

Between:

¶59

Arya Vyshya _Sanghamu, Nizamabad (lndur), represented by its president, Uppalancha, Bhumalingam S/o. Durgaiah, Age. 71 years, R/o. Near Saibaba Temple, Namdevwada, Nizamabad.

¶60

Gajawada Hanmanth_ Rao, S/o. Pandarinath, Age. 61 years, Occ.Govelnment- Service, Secretary to Arya Vysya Sangharn, Nizaniabad (lndur), R:/o. Radha Associates, Marwadigally, Nizamabad.

¶61

...REVlSlON PETITIONERS/RESPoNDENT Nos. 1 and 2

¶62

AND

¶63

1 Konda Veera Shiva Prasad S/o. Karnudu, Aged. 60 years, Occ.- Business, R/o. Veer Traders, Beside Devi Matha Temple, Devi Road, Nizamabad.

¶64

2 Darbar Murali, S/o. Kishtaiah, Aged.- 74 years, R/o. H. No. 10-943, Gajulpet, Nizamabad.

¶65

J Parsi Chandra Shekar, S/o. Lingaiah, Aged. 56 years, Occ.- Business, R/o. Pedda Bazar, Near Pothalingaiah temple, Nizamabad.

¶66

RESPON DENTS/PETITIONERS

¶67

4 (qtkgl Chiranjeevi Rao, S/o. Not known, Aged. 56 years, Occ.- Teacher, Rl/o. Manik Bhavan, Shivajinagar, Nizamabad.

¶68

5 Vishwanatham Srinivas, S/o. Gangaiah, Aged. 59 years Occ - Business, R/o H. No. 6-26-158, Gurbabadi Road, Nizamabad.

¶69

6 Boolgup-ally Mallesh, S/o. Lachaiah, Aged. 51 years, Or;c - Busrness, R/o H No.7-3-241 , Gunj road, Nizamabad.

¶70

7 Siddamshetty .!Uay Kumar, .S/o. Jagadishwer, Aged. 5.1 years, Occ._ tsusiness, R/o. H No. 1_13_404t9. Vinayitnagir, NizailaOaO.

¶71

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶72

¶73

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶74

Petition under^{Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed^{in support of the petition,the Highcourt maybe pleasedto} stay operation of^{impugned common judgment and decree daled 27.01.2023in} Election oP No.^{871 of 2O12 on the file of the I Additional District Judge,} Nizamabad^{pendingdisposal of the civil Revision Petitionin the interest of} justice

¶75

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶76

Petition under section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court maybe pleasedto} stay the^proposed election^{notification dated.06.03.2023 issued by the alleged} Ad-Hoc Committee of the society^{pending disposal of the Civil RevisionPetition} in the interest^justice.

¶77

Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. KASIBHATLA SAAKETH

¶78

Counsel for the Respondents 5 to 7: SRl. R. ANURAG

¶79

The Gourt made the following: ORDER

¶80

l I

¶81

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.831 839 & 84O of2o23 ORDER:

¶82

Thesc Civil Revision Pctitions are filed against the Common Order datcd 27 .O1 .2023 in Ele.O.P.Nos.830, 871 & 887 of 2012, passed by the learned I-Additional District Judge, Nizamabad.

¶83

Today, when the mattcr came up for hearing, both side Counsels prcsent and statecl rhat clections urere conductcd and results were also announccd as per thc Orders o[ this Court datcd 24 .O3.2023.

¶84

By Order dated 24.0i1.2023, this Court has already specihcally directed thc peIirioncr to hand over the entire records to the l)eputy Registr:rr and he in Lurn can hand over the same to lhe newly appointed Committee after the elections. As such, no caltse of action survives in these revision petitions for further adjuclication.

¶85

Accordinglv, rhese CiviI Rcvision Petitions are closed There shall be no order as to ('()sts.

¶86

¶87

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand

¶88

closed

¶89

Sd/. G. SIREESHA ASSIS TANT REGISI

/,TRUE GOPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The I Additional District^{Judge at Nizamabad}

¶94

One CC to SRl. KASIBHATLA^{SAAKETH, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶95

One CC to SRl. ALETI SRINIVAS,^Advocate [OPUC]

¶96

One CC to SRl.^R. ANURAG,^Advocate [OPUC]

¶97

Two CD Copies

NJB

HIGH COURT

PSS, J

DATED: 0610412023

,, -.,.,.-] .|,
-.:
,/t.
/,":
l,i
ili) 3 [ F,hI ?t?l
<br>

¶105

ORDER

¶106

CRP.No.831 of 2023 CRP.No.839 of 2023 & CRP.No.840 ot 2023

¶107

CLOSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS

¶108

Arya Vyshya Sanghamu v. Duddelli Ravichandra Guptha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arya Vyshya Sanghamu v. Duddelli Ravichandra Guptha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shafath Ali Khan and 3 Others Vs Noorunnisa Begum and Ano

Mr. P.Hanumanthu, Vs Smt. P.Anuraradha , Chandrakala and Another

Smt. Sharada Bai Vs T.Kishan Singh and the State of A.P.

Sudula Mallesh Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Arya Vyshya Sanghamu Vs Konda Veera Shiva Prasad and 6 others

Arya Vyshya Sanghamu, Nizamabad (Indur), Vs Chanda Laxminarayana