The High Court closed three civil revision petitions filed against common election orders. It held that since elections were conducted and records handed over per an earlier order, no cause for further adjudication survived, and the petitions are closed.
The Civil Revision Petitions were closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3208 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREI
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 831 839 840 0F 2023
Petition under Article 227 ot the Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated27.01.2O23 in Election O.p. No. 830 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge, Nizamabad
Between:
...REVISION PETTTTONERSTRESPONDENT NOs. 1 AND 2
AND
8 Siddamshetty Vijay Kumar, S/o Jagadishwer,Aged. 51 years, Occ. Business, R/o H. No. 1-13-40419, Vinayaknagar,Nizamabad.
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition under Section1 51CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the High Cou(may be pleasedto stay operation ofimpugned commonjudgment and decree daled 27 .01.2023in Election oP No. 830 of2012 on th6 file of the lAdditionalDistrict Judge. Nizamabadpending disposal of the civil Revision Petition in the interest of justice
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the High court maybe pleasedto stay theproposed election notification dated 06.03.2023rssuedby the alleged Ad-Hoc Committeeof the society pending disposal of the (lrvil RevisionPetition in the interest ofjustice
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl.KASIBHATLA SAAKETH
Counsel for the Respondents't to 4: SRl. ALETI SRINIVAS
Counsel for theRespondents 6 to 8: Sri. R. ANURAG
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
CIVIL REVISIONPETIT ION NO: 839 OF 2023
Petition under Article227 of lhe constitutionof lndiaaggrievedby the judgment and decree daled27.01 .2023 inElectionO.P. No 887 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I AdditionalDistrictJudge,Nizamabad
Between:
1 Arya Vyshya Sanghamu, Nizamabad (lndur), represented by its President, Uppalancha, Bhumalingam S/o. Durgaiah, Age. 71 years, R/o. Near Saibaba Temple, Namdevwada, Nizamabad
...REVlSlgN PETITIONERS/RESPONDENT Nos..t and 2
AND
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under section',l51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of the operation of impugned common judgment and decree dated 27.o1.2023 in Etection op No. BB7 ot 2012 on the fite of the I Additional District Judge, Nizamabad pending disposal of the civil Revision petition in the interest ofjustice.
IANO:2OF2 023
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to stay the proposed erection notification dated 06.03.2023 issued by the aleged
Ad-Hoc committee of the society pending disposal of the civil Revision petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRt. KASIBHATLA SAAKETH
Counsel for the Respondents No: 6 to 8: SRI R. ANURAG
The Court made the following: ORDER
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 840 OF 2023
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 27.01 .2023in Election O.p. No 871 of 2012 on the file of the Court of the I Additional District Judge, Nizamabad
Between:
...REVlSlON PETITIONERS/RESPoNDENT Nos. 1 and 2
AND
RESPON DENTS/PETITIONERS
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
/'
lA NO: 2 OF 2023
Petition underSection151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filedin support of the petition,the Highcourt maybe pleasedto stay operation ofimpugned common judgment and decree daled 27.01.2023in Election oP No.871 of 2O12 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Nizamabadpendingdisposal of the civil Revision Petitionin the interest of justice
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High Court maybe pleasedto stay theproposed electionnotification dated.06.03.2023 issued by the alleged Ad-Hoc Committee of the societypending disposal of the Civil RevisionPetition in the interestjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. KASIBHATLA SAAKETH
Counsel for the Respondents 5 to 7: SRl. R. ANURAG
The Gourt made the following: ORDER
l I
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.831 839 & 84O of2o23 ORDER:
Thesc Civil Revision Pctitions are filed against the Common Order datcd 27 .O1 .2023 in Ele.O.P.Nos.830, 871 & 887 of 2012, passed by the learned I-Additional District Judge, Nizamabad.
2
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed
Sd/. G. SIREESHA ASSIS TANT REGISI
/,TRUE GOPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
VH
NJB
,,
HIGH COURT
PSS, J
DATED: 0610412023
,, -.,.,.-] .|,
-.:
,/t.
/,":
l,i
ili) 3 [ F,hI ?t?l
<br>
ORDER
CRP.No.831 of 2023 CRP.No.839 of 2023 & CRP.No.840 ot 2023
CLOSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITIONS
i
2 issues framed by the court
wether the civil revision petitions against election orders require further adjudication once elections are conducted and records handed over.
whether the impugned judgment and decree survive as a cause of action after the procedural directives of the Court are complied with.
Arya Vyshya Sanghamu
Gajawada Hanmanth Rao
Duddelli Ravichandra Gupta
Muthyam Venkanna Gupta
Palthi Venkata Ramulu Gupta
Nagamalla Sathyanarayana Gupta
P. Sree Sudha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
