Criminal Revision filed by a husband challenging the maintenance order granted to his minor children by the Family Court. The High Court found no infirmity in the order, noting children's neglect, and dismissed the revision.
Criminal Revision Case No. 2101 of 2018 dismissed with no costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 2101 OF 2018
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C order dated: 12-03-2018 in MC.No.224 ot 2013 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, at L.B.Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.
Between:
D. Arjun Yadav, S/o D. Yadaiah, Aged about 32years, Occ: Diary Business, Rl/o H.No.2-1 17l5/A, Hussain Shavali Darga Shaikpet, Ranga Reddy District.
...Petitioner/respondent
AND
Respondents'1 to 3 are being minors
Rep. by their Grandfather M.Raghu Ramulu Yadav All arc No.2O-1-37011, Golla Kidiki Puranapul, Old City, Hyderabad.
...Respondents
...Respondents/Complainant
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition, the High Court maybe pleased to stay all further proceedings in M.C.No.224 of 2013 on the file of the Judge Family Court, at L.B.Nagar, RanagreddyDistrict, pending disposalof the above Crl.R.C.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI J. ANANTARAM
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 3: SR!V. RAGHUNATH
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: PUBLICPROSECUTOR
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVIION CASE No.2101of 2o18
ORDER:
The petitioner/husbandis questioning the grantingof maintenance of Rs.3,000/-per month to the respondent No.1 and Rs.1,500/- per month each to the2nd and 3'd respondents.
4 Accordingly, the Criminal RevisionCase is dismlssed'No costs'
Miscellaneous Petitions,pendingif any, shall standclosed.
I
Sd/-M.RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTR,AR //TRUE coPYil ArD sEcrioN oFFrcER
To,
kam gr.- i1
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010712023
ORDER
CRLRC.N0.2101ot 2018
,J
i,,-: 0 2 sEP 2tr9
.t *
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE
PPLq, +(48
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Family Court's order granting maintenance to minor children.
Whether the awarded maintenance amounts are insufficient in the present cost of living.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
D. Arjun Yadav
D.Nitya Sri
D.Dharma Teja
D.Sahi Teja
State of Telangana
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
