Dismissed

Golla Narayana , Thota Hanumandlu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Jul 2023CRLRC/2049/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Criminal Revision Case under Ss. 397 & 401 CrPC, the High Court held that it was barred by S. 197(2) CrPC from exercising jurisdiction in an interlocutory order relating to the passport document. The petitioner was granted liberty to move by inherent jurisdiction. The revision petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to move in inherent jurisdiction; Criminal Revision Case dismissed without costs.

Golla Narayana , Thota Hanumandlu Vs The… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2049 OF 2018

¶7

Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of CrPC against the Judgment daled 26.07.2O18 made in C.F.R No. 2570 of 2018 on the file of the ll Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nizamabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Golla Narayana, Thota Hanumandlu, S/o. Thota Mallaiah, age 43 years, Occ: Private Service, F/o. H.No.2-10, Baddhur, Dichpally Mandal, Nizamabad District.

¶10

...PETITIONER/ ACCUSED No.1

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Through SHO Dichpalli Police Station, Represented by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

lA NO:'1 OF 2018

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumslances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to direct the release of passport bearing No. J0377156 to the petitioner.

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T.SUJAN REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

¶19

THE HON f,URABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SI,IRENDER CRIMIN., rL REVISION CASE NO.2O49 of 2(t).8

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

Thc l:levis :rrr Petitioner is questioning t he o.'c er of the learned 11 ,,\d litional Judicial F irst Cla ss vlrrgir;trate, Nizamabad in s( tting aside orclers passed in C .F.R. Nrr.2 .17O of 20 18 dated ?-e'.(7 .2018, raising an objection tlra( tL t: Passport bearing No.JO3i 7 156 is the main document irL the :i:se and it is not a propert. Hence, the petition was retu rne(l The said order is inl erloc ut.ory in nature and this Cot rt is p rot.ibited under Scclion \97 (21 of Cr.P.C from, exercrsirrE; 6,:w,:rs in interlocrrtorr or( e^-s

¶22

Horvevr:r,^.h,: ltetitioner is at liberty to rrov,: t,trs court under inherent^- L-rrisdiction.

¶23

3 . Accordin gl the Criminal Revision Case is <lismissed Miscellaneor-rs rp plications pending, if any, s;lrzrll stand

¶24

closed.

¶25

SI)/.B.SiATYAVATHI DEPU'rY,. BEGISTRAR ,_ .u;) //TRUE^COPY// S E CTION^OFFICER

¶26

¶27

s a'ie 'r i, $l"tflt,'fri i[+]-:;,tilfl,ll:a.lHf#:i:":"'. 4. Two^{CD CoPie:s} PSK.c

HIGH COURI

DATED:07107 t2.023

ORDER

CRLRC.No.2049 of 2018

¶34

,-.<. )..
' 't ruq ilTI

¶35

DISMISSING THE CRLRC WITHOUT CO{;TS.

¶36

B.r ?v \

Golla Narayana , Thota Hanumandlu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Golla Narayana , Thota Hanumandlu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avisetti Prasada Rao, (A9) Vs The State of A.P.

Kollu Naresh Vs State of Telangana

Mohd. Atheeq Khan Vs Sahera Begum

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Vs Yennam Srinivas Reddy, (a-1)

Teddu Sailoo Vs the State of A.P.

Armu Dilip, Julgipodi [v], Mandla Dist. [M.P.] Vs the State of a.P., Rep. by P.P., Hyderabad.