High Court dismissed the criminal revision case as infructuous on the submission by petitioners counsel that the cause in the petition did not survive.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3251 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1890 oF 2018
Revision Case filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C., against the Order dated 11.04.2018 passed in Crl,A.No. 75 ol 2017 on the file of the tt Additionat District & Sessions Judge (FTC), Mancherial by confirming the Order dated O4.O4.2O17 passed in D.V,C.No. 12 of 2016 on the flle of the I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Mancherial
Between:
...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS NO. 2 & 3
AND
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
... RESPONDENT/PETITION ER
l.A NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 397(1) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dt 11-O4-2Ofi in Crl.A.No. 75 of 2017 on the file.of the ll Addl. District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Mancherial by confirming the order dl 04-04-2017 in D.V.C No 12 ot 2016 on the file of I Addt Judicial 1st Class Magistrate at Mancherial, pending disposal of the Criminat Revision Case.
Counsel for Petiti )r'ers : Sri CHALAKANI VENKAf yAt A,/
Counsel for Resp rndent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUiOR
Counsel for Resp rndent NO.2 : None appeared
The Court made tl re following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI .IUSTTCE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.189O OF 2018
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the cause in the present Criminal Revision Case does not survive.
be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/. K. SAILESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR L]D SECTION OFFICER
To,
Nib'CY\IL
HIGH COUF I'
DATED: 1011712023
-::. * .
.a q 1t\E Si.i>
i:"' qa
t':/t i\c
/^-
l:'l
ll'- 2l [[E 2tr8 L
\i
ORDER
CRLRC.No.1890 oI20'18
DISMISSING TH : CRLRC
AS INFRUCTUO
'.S.
I d(^\ 0 M
o'
Nimmala Satyanarayana Reddy and another
The State of A.P and others
K. Surender
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
