In a Criminal Revision, the High Court of Telangana dismissed the petition as infructuous because the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause did not survive, rendering no order as to costs.
Criminal Revision Case dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t I i I I : l
[32s1 ]
l'
I lr
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF ]ULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
CRIMINAL REVISION SE NO: 1443 OF 2O1a
Criminal Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C against the Order made in Crl.M.P.No.595 of 2018 in M.C.No.227 of 2Ot7, dated 09-06-2018 on the file of the Court of the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of lubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case-CumAdditional Family Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
Syed Younus Ali Khizar, S/o. Late Hazrath Syed Mazhar Ali Quadri, Occ:Imam (Khatib), R/o.H.No.1-9-606, Near Mohammedia Masjid, Beside MLC Saleem, Adikmet, Hyderabad.
.... REVISION PETITIONER
AND
.. . . RESPONDENTS
rA NO: 1()F 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition. the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of the Order dated 09-06-2018in Crl.M.P.No.595 of 2018 in M.C.No.227 of 2077passed by the Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the Trial of lubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Case-Cum-Addl. Family Court, Hyderabadpending disposal of the above Crl.R.C.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl MOHD NADEEM
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: THOLLA VENKATA RAMANA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent No.2: PUBLIC PRoSECUTOR'
The Court made the following: ORDER
//
THE H(INOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE !<.SUR,ONDER CRIMI:VAL REVISION CASE No.1843 Crr 2()18
ORDER:
The leirrned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present Criminal Revisi,rn Cilse coes not survrve.
Miscell,rneous applications pendirg, if ;rnt, shall
stand closed
I ITRUEcoPY/ /
;d7 -T.SRINIVAS Dl:PUT { REGISTRAR ( lt)
St:CTION OFFICER
To,
Pr^6'
HIGH COURT
DATED: LOlt T /2023
ORDER
.-a'
1$' - ieIE 6;r.-.
:):) 1 I rttNB i'
1. .*
il,
<br>\ '--.l1 //
CRLRC.No.1343 of 2O18
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE IS DISMISSI:D AS INFRUCTUOUS
?r,\q, l^\d*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cause in the present criminal revision case survives to be admitted.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Syed Younus Ali Khizar
Tanveer Begum
The State of Telangana
Justice K. Sumernder
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
