The Court dismissed the criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash proceedings under Sections 379, 511, 109 IPC, and 3 PDPPA. The petitioner was represented by Sri Anantha Chary Kurella.
The Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e91
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6438 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No. 1 to 5
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,the HighCourt may be pleased toquash thepetitioners/Accused No.1 to 5 in Crime No.60 of 2015ol P.S., Madgul, Mahaboobnagar District for the offenceunder section379, 511, 109 IPC 3 PDPPA.
LA. NO: 'l OF 2015(c RLPMP.NO: 6355 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.Cpraying that inthe circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds ofCriminal Petition,the HighCourt may be pleased to stay the arrest ofthe petitioners/Accused No.1 to 5 in crimeNo. 60 of 2O15 of P.S Madgul, MahaboobnagarDistrict, pending disposalof the Criminal Petition.
This Petitiorr(,lrning on for hearing, upon perusing trt, Memorandum of Grounds of Crirnina)()tition and upon hearing the argumer t!; of Sri ANANTHA CHARY KUREL,LA. ,,dvocate for the Petitioner and Sri KHIZ,\ VIZARATH ALI, Assistant Publ c P' s--cutor on behalf of the Respondenl N,) 1 and none appeared for th: Res rc ndent No. 2
The Court made the 'ollowing: ORDER
I I
, I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5438 of 2015
ORDER:
Heard Sri Anantha Chary Kuretta, learned counse[ representing on behatf of the petitioners and Sri Khaza Vizarath Ati, learned Assistant Pubtic Prosecutor
representing on behatf of learned Pubtic Prosecutor.
offence under Sections 379, 511, 109 IPC 3 of PDPPA.
the charge sheet was taid the said Crime No. 60 of2015 has
been renumbered as C.C. No. 317 of 2017. Subsequentty,
2
EVV,] crLP 6438 2015
the accus,:c #ere acquitted on the tite crf Jrrnior CiviI Courts, Katr,ra kurthy. Therefore, no f urther orders are
required her c,l seeks to dismiss this crinrinaI pr:ti1_ion.
by both the counsel this Court is inclined r:c' drsmiss this petition as i,f 'uctuous.
As a se quet, misceltaneous petitions, perrding if any, shatI stano c iosed.
Sd/. N. CHAiITIRA SEKHARRAO ASSISTAI]T REGISTRAR
//TRUE GoPY//
l:'
\
SiECTION OFFICER
To,
'1 . The Judicial F rst Class lt4agistrate at Kalwakurthy.
Njb
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 51A6t2023
ORDER
CRLP.No.6433 of 2015
:i i It:
,v t l{E
i
J+
/,'
l,i'i
1s t[]tll[] .Lz
,+
tlIr>,:
,-L'\ *
i\i
DISMISSING THE(;RLP AS INFRUCTUOUS.
E'
LF
'1r $j
4
YR.> 4'Yl
il)
/ ''_ /
l(
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition filed to quash the proceedings against the petitioners/accused should be allowed.
The Supreme Court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process of court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Palle Jangaiah and Ors.
The State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
