Dismissed

Margoni Masaiah v. The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Telangana HC15 Jun 2023CRLP/13350/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed three criminal petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous. Petitioner counsel submitted that the underlying criminal trial (CC No. 1099 of 2015) had already concluded with a final order dated 24.03.2022, rendering the appeals untenable.

What did the court decide?

The criminal petitions were dismissed as infructuous because the trial court proceedings had been closed.

Margoni Masaiah Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY,T]-I.E FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWo rHousAND AND rwe[iv;HRJ.-

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIM INALP ETITIO NNO :13 350 0F 2015

¶7

Between:

¶8

Margoni Masaiah B,i d N;* S#ffi !f(."#:,9f,*r,rrirxd.sn?o^about 63yrs, R/o HrG

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETITroNERS/ACCUSED

¶11

',i,H"uff I{{"i;:}:H+:[ff :"",.'ri;trf.iii"}il:sir:?,*

¶12

...1"t RESPONDENT/STATE

¶13

'ff#[t;1[,n"]'."4.,tt#;ilflqi]i8"?,^1T,,,,,.

¶14

...2nd REspoNDENT/DEFAcro coMpLAtNANT

¶15

. Petition under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the ctrcumstances stated in the Memorandm oi'C.o"rnO. of Criminal petition, il"e_[$:ii$#ii;lsip".lr:l[tn,,,xlli,;**ll,lfiffii5 chief Metroporitan Maoistrate, Hyteraoajil;'il. taken on fire for the ,15';ffffi::"",1't;::ff1:: 19t;,.^{[,. i"l"i"} li".r,^{the same} asainst ins*l;ni, oJ";fu;=.r;tJ|ents^{or the complaintdo not} ;ft'd-i;; o: o 20 5 CRL MP. NO: 132850F 15

¶16

Petition . under Section 4A2 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum oi'oro"unos of criminar petition, l"-19!^Couf 1ay^{be preased^to,t"v oi} rri ri.t"#i pro"""dings inctudino appearance of the petitioner in CC.No. f ogg "f z'oit ;" th" ;i;; ffiil; of the Hon,bte ,t Additionat Cf,i"f rr,f.trop"]tt#'ilagistrate, Hyderabad, pending disposat of the criminat petitron, in itre lrill"r, of justice.

¶17

l.A. NO: 20F itl ! ;(cRLPM P. NO : 134460F2015)

¶18

Petitior rirrder Section 482 of Cr.p.C pra lr g that in the circumstances; s lated in the Memorandrm oi CroinO. cf r)6;;1,nr1 petition, Il:. ligj.oour^{rnaybe pteasedto rec;iv;} t;;-Jopv .t he statement of LW 1, Extract o (ieneral C.t g9"-k grf"""", iitrr"t ,,details of cash book balance, a:rstract as on 30.06.200S anJ pr"s. not.: (riv€)n by the 2nd respondent ht..re rn as additional documents in'C,.^-p ruc f 33fi0 of 2015 in the interest of j,.r ;ti:e

¶19

This^petiti :rn coming bn foi hearing, upon perusrng t.re lrlemorandum of Grounds oj, ( rininal petition and upon hearing the e rguments of Sri c.L NAGESWCF.A RAO, Advocate for the petitionlr ani tMiS VTZARATH ALl, Assist,ant l).rblic prosecutor on behalf of the Resp:r.de.t No. 1 and none appeare(l f r. ths Respondent No.2

¶20

The Court maclt: the following: ORDER

¶21

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No.13350 oF 2015

¶24

ORDER

¶25

Mr. G.L. Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the subject matter of, the crimina-l petition has become infructuous as the case is closed before the Court below vide order dated 24.03.2022 in C.C"No.1099 of 2O15. To substantiate the same, learned counsel filed a copy of e_courts proceedings. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the criminal petition as infructuous.

¶26

Mr. Vizarath Ali learned Assistant public prosecutor appearing for the respondent is present.

¶27

Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶28

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶29

sd/-N. //TRUE COPYII rci!?m,iE[Bf,+[ls

¶30

To,

¶31

SECTION OFFICER

¶32

The ilt Additional Chief M etropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

¶33

The Station House Officer, S.R.Nagar police Station, Hyderabad

¶34

one CC to sii f. RAT'N^, -

¶35

' +5:EHi""tii,:rr##ff i"JJ:'.,,h e S,a,e or

¶36

Njb

¶37

Two CD Copies \ir-

il lr I

t t

i I

HIGH COUII'T

DATED:1 s,ttrit2OZ3

ORDER

CRLP.No.1lt3S0 of 2015

¶45

, , .'..,,.j-:::..
,: -,,.\1., .<br>i.,
-' i) ':'
i :,r,
[1 ,l!L?[TJ

¶46

't,.-

¶47

DISMISSING THE ( RIMINAL PETITION

¶48

AS INFRUCTUOt.TS .

¶49

v) .)
<br>)
cx
4/'

¶50

,.1

Margoni Masaiah v. The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Margoni Masaiah v. The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Ash Mishra and Another Vs the State of Telangana and Another

Yata Venkat Reddy, Khammam Dt and 2 Otrs., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Syed Yahiya Rabbani Vs The State of Telangana Rep. by its Secretary

Tanver Ahmed, Hyd., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Azeema Khatoon , Zeenath Bee, Hyd and 4 Othrs Vs Maleka Begum, Hyd and Ano

Palle Jangaiah, Mahabubnagar Dt and 4 Otrs., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.