In Writ Petition No. 1744 of 2015, the Court dismissed the petition as infructuous upon the petitioner's submission and the respondent's acquiescence that the cause of action no longer survived.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t32ee I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO: 17214 OF 2015
Between:
Syed Yahiya Rabbani, S/o Late Syed Jeelani, Aged 60 years, Occ: Business, Ri/o. Flat Nos. 201 and 203 Jeelani Meadows, D. D. colony Amberpet, Hyderabad.
..,PETITIONER
AND
:office at Secretariat of Telangana, Hyderabad.
Respondents 7 and 8 No 2-2-25/A, Flat NO. 504 Jeelani Meadows, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad.
Respondents 9 and 10 are No 2-2-2514"/1 , Flat No.404, Jeelani Meadows, Bagh Amberpet, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition urrdr r Article 226 of the Constitution rf lndt;r prerying that in the circumstances sla t .d in the affidavit filed therewith, the l.igh Court may be pleased to lssue ar a ppropriate writ or order or direc.ion mo.e particularly in the nature of writ of n rr damus declaring the action of the re sltondents 1 to 5 in interfering in a civil tir;pute and registering a case against Ire petitioner in Cr.No. 528 of 2014 of P S l\mberpet for offence under Seclron 3l;,1 lpC, 324,323 and 506 read with Secti )n 34 IPC is arbitrary and violativr: of Art :les; 165 and 21 of Constitution and r;o r s{)quently direct the respondents'l to 5 :r qr- ash Cr. No. 52g ot 2O14 of P.S.. Art erpet.
l.A. NO:1 oF 201 51lE'MP. NO: 2324 OF 2015)
Petition .-rnc er section i 51 cpc praying that in the cir,;_ mstances stated in the affidavit filed in s lpport of the petition, the High Col rt rna,r l.re pleased to order for stay of all furth,:r rroceedings in Cr.No. S2B of 2O14 tf pS.. .rrmt,erpet.
Counsel for the Pr-'ti ioner: M/s. AMEENA NUREN FOR SRI l[.,,MUJEEB Counsel for the R,:s rondent Nos.1 TO 5: AGp FOR HOME Counsel for the Rr:s )ondent Nos.6 TO 12: -
The Court made the b lowing: ORDER
\ \
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTTCE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No . 1744 of 2015
ORDER:
Heard Ms. Ameena Nuren, representing Sri M.A Mujeeb on behatf of petitioner and Sri Sairam, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
4 ln view of the submissions of both the counset, this Court is inclined to dismiss the writ petition as
infructuous.
EVV,] ]P 17 44 2015
2
As ;r :equet, miscellaneous petitLons, plending if any,
sha[[ sta rc c losed.
o'.',, ?Rii Ja'AI3i[^'E //IRUE coPY/t (i.
SEC:TION OFFICER
To
One CC to SF I I,,|.A.MUJEEB, CC to SF I I,,|.A.MUJEEB, to SF I I,,|.A.MUJEEB, SF I I,,|.A.MUJEEB, I,,|.A.MUJEEB, Advocate [OPUC]
1
One CC to SF I I,,|.A.MUJEEB, CC to SF I I,,|.A.MUJEEB, to SF I I,,|.A.MUJEEB, SF I I,,|.A.MUJEEB, I,,|.A.MUJEEB, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs CCs tc G GI FOR HOME, High Court for the S.ate of'I,:larrgana, at
2 Two CCs CCs tc G GI Hyderabad i)LrTl
Two CD Coprr s
PSK. GJP
HIGH COU RT
DATED:1 410ri12023
ORDER
WP.No.174,+ )f 2015
/:.' -1 irli
'.' :,1 /c.
I .J
l(l
'l 1 ,ltJt. 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUC IJI)US WITHOUT COSTS.
05
@.s
fqk
l)
/^bo
M.A. Mujeeb
The State of Telangana Rep. by its Secretary, Home Department
Commissioner of Police
Deputy Commissioner of Police
Assistant Commissioner of Police
Inspector of Police
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
