The High Court dismissed the criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous because the proceedings in the quo warranto case had been disposed of via an uncontested acquittal dated 26.10.2021.
The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5897 OF 201s
Between:
TANVER AHMED, S/o. Dr. Shaik Rahamtullah, Aged about 41 yirars, Occ: Engineer at Saudi Electricity Company, Jeddah, Permanent Resident of Door No.B-3-'167/4/27, Vikaspuri Nagar, Vengairao Nagar, Hyderabad.
... PETITIONERYACCUSED NO.3
AND
1.)STATE OF TELANGANA, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C No. 168 of 2015 on the file of Xlll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2015(CRLPMP. NO: 5854 OF 201s)
Petition under Section 482 of CI.P-C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Fetition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including execution of Non bailable warrants in c.0 No. 168 of 2015 on the file of xlll Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally, Hyderabad, Pending disposal of the petition for quashing This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds Of Criminal Petition and upon , hearing the arguments of Sri K. SRINIVASA REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor (TG)on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2 The Court made the follonriing: ORDER
,, I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No. 5897 of 2015
ORDER:
Heard Sri Syed Sohait, [earned counsel for the petitioner. No representation on behatf of the unofficiat respondent. Sri Khaza Vizarath Ati, learned Assistant Pubtic Prosercutor representing on behatf of learned pubtic Prosecutor is present.
I ,
subject mat[er in this criminat petition does not survive, as
r;=.-g
EVV,J CRLP 5897 2015
2
the subject matter in C.C.No. 168 of 2015 wasdisposedof in the nature of Uncontested-Acquittal dated26.10.2021 and submits that no further orders required in thispetition
and accordingty seeks to dismiss this criminatpetition.
As a sequet, misce[[aneous petitions, pending if any, shat[ stand ctosed.
Sd/.MOHD.ISMAIL ASSISTANTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// q)
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1 . The courtof Xlll Addl. chiefMetropolitan Magistrate at Nampally Hyderabad 2. fne SHO,P.S., Mirchowk, Hyderabad 3. d;Ei ttsdi. k. sdtrutvn'sAREDDY Adygcqle[oPUc] 4 . i;; 66.'i"th" pualrc pnoseCuron,Hish Court for the Stateof Telanganaat HYderabad [OUT] 5. Two CDCoPies KKS
I<br>
HIGH COURT
DATED:1510612023
$E SfAf A
lP
oo)t 'r g tlJL ?$zl o
I
t r,"- , . -.rtCi
---.;:Z-
ORDER
CRLP.No.5897 of 2015
DISMISSING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings is infructuous as the underlying case was disposed of by an acquittal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tanver Ahmed
State of Telangana
Uzma Amatullah
Justice E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
