Dismissed

G Surendar , Surender Amba Das v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Mar 2023CRLP/6328/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal petition filed to quash an FIR alleging cheating and bribery under IPC sections 408 and 494. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous since investigation was concluded and chargesheet was filed, allowing accused to approach ICC separately.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; accused at liberty to move Court below seeking quashment of charge sheet.

G Surendar , Surender Amba Das Vs The State of… — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32sl ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6328 OF 2020

¶7

Between:

¶8

G Surendar @ Surender Amba Das, S/o Tulasidas, Age 35 years Occupation. Software Employee, R/o 8-24ISS/G-4, Sai Sadan Apartments Nizampet Hyderabad- 500 090

¶9

Smt.G.Bharathamma, Wo Tulasi Das, Aged about 52 years, Occ. Housewife, Fyo 5-61, Rampur, Huzura, Karimnagar District

¶10

G-Tulasi Das, S/o Rajaram, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Lecturer, Ryo 5-6'1, Rampur, Huzura, Karimnagar District

¶11

G.Raju, S/o Tulasi Das, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Pvt. Emplooyee, Ryo 5-61, Rampur' Huzura' Karimnagar District'

¶12

...pETraoNERS/A1 To A4

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of Telangana, Rep., by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad through SHO, CCS (DD) WPS.

¶15

G. Rani, W/o G. Surender Amba Das, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Housewife, Rlo 8-3-228h280/481, Yousufguda, Hyderabad

¶16

...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR No. 47312020 Dl.10lOgl2O20 on the file of the P.S CCS (Dd) Women, Hyderabad City against the petitioners / Al to 44

¶18

!.A. NO: 2 OF 2020

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners/ Al to A4 in FIR No. 47312020 Dt.1010912O20 on the fite of the P.S CCS (Dd) Women, Hyderabad City.

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri.J.K.RANJlT KUMAR, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Sri Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HOi{OURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K'SUFIE:;NDER}

¶23

i I Ii I I

¶24

CRIITINAL PETITIOI!-!Ie-6!a8-o-E2c:i2o

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

This tlrim nrrl Petition^{is filcrl under- Sec'ior-rz l3 2 of the Code} ofCrimina]Prorer]ure,i973(fursl-rort.Cr.P.C',)byt)repetitioners who are arra]'e(^{irs AccusedNos.I to 4 seeking to cluash the FIR} No.473 of 2O2'. 'rn^{the file of Station HouseOflic:er,CCS (Dd)} WomenPo'icei:tetion,Hyderabadregisteredlbrth::ffr:nceunder Sections 41)8-A^{aIId 494 0f the Indian Penal Code €I1,1 section 6 0f} Dowry Prohibit^{rr Act.}

¶27

On nstrr tctions^{and zls pe r thee-courlsi citsestatus} 1e rrned Additional^{PublicProse cutot} 'l'ould^submit proceedings, that zrfter^{com >It:tion of investigertionln} thr: suL^j t:ct crime,^the police filed cl^{Largesheet beforethe} Court^{,lc,ncornedand} C.C.No.92:17 o'^{2C22 was assigned.Hence,the pI a',rersoughtfor} in the present^{: etitionhas become infructuous'}

¶28

3.Recordinl.theaforesaidsubmission,tht:Crirr.nalPetitionis dismissed as it,fiuctuous.^{Hor.r'ever, the petitiontr'Ac':used is at} Iiberty to :IovC^{tl-ris courtseekingquashmentol' lfre proceedings} of the charge^{sl te=t.}

¶29

Miscellarr:ous^{Petitions, pendingif any, shallrs} la!^d.closed. Sd/,P.PAI)I,,IANIABHA REDDY ASSI STANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' )*

¶30

{]ECI'ION OFFICER

¶31

¶32

The Xlll ,Addit^lnrrl Chief^{Metropolitan Magistrate,at Namrally, Hyderabad.}

¶33

The Stat on H:^{us;eOfficer, CCS (Dd) WomenPolice Stat c'r'r, Hyderabad.} 3. Two CCs to tlr^{: t)ublic Prosecutor,High Court for the Starr of 1'elanganaat} Hyderabad^(C JT)

¶34

Ohe CC to Srl J.l(.Ranjit^{Kumar,Advocate} [OPUC]

¶35

One CC to Sr 3opala Krishna^{Kalanidhi, Advocate} [OPU:;' 8"\c.,' 6. Two CD Copir: ; _.Kj

HIGH COURT

DATED:20103t2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.6328 of 2t 2t)

¶40

.z:l- H E
-t4 6
,1 't)'
/,'. - <
// |
'.-
i: lt :' I 1 Hlll 2023
<br>,, i;i

¶41

oq, (Qr tr<sup>\V,?,

¶42

DISMISSING THE^(; I1..P. AS INFRUCTUOUS

G Surendar , Surender Amba Das v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G Surendar , Surender Amba Das v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Cherla Anand Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

A.C. Omkar Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Turaka Madhava Rayudu and 5 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Mohammed Abdul Muqeet Aman and 2 Others Vs State of Telangana and another

Nandigama Rama Rao Vs State of Telangana and Another

Anugu Madhavreddy and 6 others Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others