Dismissed

A.Ravinder Goud v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Jun 2023CRLP/6180/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of a Criminal Petition filed by A.Ravinder Goud to quash proceedings in FIR No. 213 of 2022 under Sections 286 of IPC and Section 9(b)(1XB) of the Explosive Act. The Court dismissed the petition as infructuous after the Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that the charge sheet had been filed and the case was initiated on a C.C.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No. 6180 of 2022 dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

A.Ravinder Goud Vs The State of Telangana — Corruption | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

CRIMINAL PETI TION NO: 6180 0F 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

A.Ravinder Goud, S/o Bagaiah, aged about 4g years, Occ. Contractor, R/o Parveda viilage Shankirpatty ilranOat, n.i.Oislricr.

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETITIoNER/AGCUSED No.1

¶11

The State of Telangana, through S:H O., Kandukur police Station, Ranga Reddy District, rep. by FuUtic pijseiutor, High b;u,t:-'Hyderabad.

¶12

N.Kondaru, Sub-rnspectorof porice, Kandukur porice station, Kandukur Rachakonda Commissioinerate, n.n.Oiitr[i

¶13

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT

¶14

Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, ll" Ii9I,^{C-oy!_may be pteased to cail for the records retating} to the i,tR. No. 213 0t 2022 0n the fire of the Kandukur porice stationlRachakonda Commissionerate, R.R. District, and quash the proceedings thereon.

¶15

l.A. NO;1 OF 2022

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all furthei pro"u"Jing. including the arrest of the petitioners in F.l.R. l.io. 213 ot 2o22on the file of the Kandukur^porice Station, Rachakonda commissionerate, n.n.oiiiiict, pending disposal of the Criminal petition

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri K.RAM MURTHY, Advocate for the petitioner and sri s.GANESH, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and none appeared for the Respondent No. 2

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶20

CRIMINIAL PETITION No.61EO of 2022

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

This Crirrinal Petition Ls I-iled under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedurt:, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.) by the petitioner who is arrayed as Accused No.1 to quash Lhe proceedings against him in IrlR No.213 of 2022 on the [-rle of Station House Officcr, Kanrlukur Police Station, Rachakonda, registered for the offences punishable under Section 286 ol IPC and Section 9(b)(1XB) o[ the I*plosii,c Act, 1884.

¶23

On instn.rctions, Iearn.ed Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that after comple,,icn of investigation in the subject crime, the policr: Iiled charge sheet before the Court concerned and C.C. No.3!l ol 2O23 *rrs assigncd. Thcrefrrrc, nothing survives in this r:riminal petition for adjudication.

¶24

Recording the aforesaid submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as irfructuous.

¶25

Miscellanecus Pe titions, pcnding if any, shalI stand closed

¶26

Sd/- A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR GD //TRUE COPY//

¶27

SECTION^OFFICER

¶28

To,

¶29

The XVll Metropolitan^{Magistrate, Cyberabad at Maheshwaram'}

¶30

The Station^{House Officer, Kandukur Police Station, Rachakonda} District.

¶31

Two CCs to^{the Public Prosecutor, High Courtfor the State of} Telangana at^{Hyderabad(OUT)}

¶32

4.	OneCCtoSri^{K.RAM MURTHY, Advocate}[OPUCI
5.	TwoCDCoPies
<sup>*,0	\+.--

I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 910612023

ORDER

CRLP.No.6180 ot 2022

.e 5tArt-
)
/.ir'.
'; lt
j t, lut NB
I
\ 7z '..3 : -';, ' 1r'?,'-,,:.r
.-.']---

¶40

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶41

AS INFRUCTUOUS.

¶42

.-1
<br>\ +\12

A.Ravinder Goud v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Ravinder Goud v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Malla Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Balgari Govindu , Suresh Babu Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Chaganti Lakshmi Kumari and 2 others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Mohammed Saleem Uddin Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Badhe Shobha Rani Vs State of Telangana and another

Sajida Begum Vs The State of Telangana