Dismissed

Smt. Chaganti Lakshmi Kumari and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC16 Jun 2023CRLP/7742/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed a Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of an FIR related to dowry and aggravated injury. The petition was held infructuous as the investigation concluded with the filing of a charge sheet and challan.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous following filing of charge sheet and challan.

Smt. Chaganti Lakshmi Kumari and 2 others Vs The… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:7742 OF 2022

¶6

Between:

¶7

Smt. Chaganti Lakshmi Kumari (A-2) W/o Chaganti Rama Krishna, Aged about 56 years, Occ. House wife, H.No.15-57, Hanuman Nagar, Near Ramalayam, Venkatapuram Panchayiti, Eluru, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 534001.

¶8

Arigela Sreenivasa Rao, S/o Jaganadham,(A-3) aged about 58 years, Occ. Head Master, Z.P.High School, Mundrur, Pedavegi Mandal, West Godavari District. Ryo. 15-36/1 , Opposite Kanakadurga Temple Street, Hanuman Nagar, Western Locks, Eluru, West Godavari District. Andhra Pradesh - 534001 .

¶9

Srigala Jaganadham, S/o Venkatachalam, aged about 80 years, Occ. Retired f^{mployee,R/o H.No. Jabba Vari} Street, T. Narasapuiam Mandalam, T. Narasapuram, W.G. District. Andhra Pradesh -534467

¶10

...Petitioners/Accused.

¶11

AND

¶12

The-State of Telangana and another, Rep. its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana Hyderabad.

¶13

Arigala Saritha, Wo Rama Krishna, Aged about 44 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Flat No.119, SVRS Apartments, Venkatadri Block, Venkateswara Colony, Saroornagar, Hyderabad

¶14

...Respondents/Complainant

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased topleased to quash the proceedings in Crime No.30112Q22 of Saroornagar Women Police Station, Rachakonda.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay all further investigation including arrest of the petitioners in Crime No.30112022 of Saroornnagar Women Police Station, Rachakonda, pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C Sharan Reddy , Advocate for the Petitioners and the Asst Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.1 is not appearing in person or by Advocate.

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶21

CRIMINAL PETITION No.7742^OF 2022

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

This Criminal Petition is fited under^{Section 482 Cr.P.C.} by the petitioners/A2 to A4 to^{quash the FIR No.301 of 2022 on} the file of Station House Officer,^{SaroornagarWPS Police} Station, Rachal< onda, registered^{for the offence under Sections} 498-,\ and 324 IPC and Sections^{3 and 4 of the Dowry} Prohibition Act.

¶24

. On instructions and^{as per the e-courts case status} proceedings, learned Assistant^{Public Prosecutor would submit} that after completion of^{investigationin the subjectcrime,} police have filecl charge^{sheet beforethe Court concernedand} C.C.No.5O62 of^{'2022was assigned.Therefore,nothingsurvives} in this criminal^petition for^{adjudication.}

¶25

a Recording the aforesaid^{submission,the CriminalPetition} is dismissed as infructuous.

¶26

Miscellaneous Petitions,^{if anY} ,^{shall standclosed} , Sd/- K.AMMAJI

¶27

ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR /-: //TRUE COPY// L_S SECTION OFFICER

¶28

To,

¶29

The V Additional^{Metropolitan[,4agistrateat L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad'}

¶30

2- The Station^{Hc,use Officer, SaroornagarWomenPolice Station, Rachakonda'}

¶31

One CC to^{Sri. C Sharan Reddy, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶32

Two CCs to^{Asst Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, [OUT]}

¶33

J Trruo CFI Cooies

HIGH COURT

DATED:16/06/2023

ORDER

.:<br>,r t'iA II]
LF )a.'
!!^.
?s8
12 tu<br><)

¶38

CRLP.tio.7742 ot 2022

¶39

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION

¶40

8
os )nf a
(,,1

Smt. Chaganti Lakshmi Kumari and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Chaganti Lakshmi Kumari and 2 others v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. v. Vara Prasad Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. v. Vara Prasad Vs The State of Telangana

Nippani Venkata Sesha Gowtham Vs The State of Telangana and 2 Others

K.Malla Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Balgari Govindu , Suresh Babu Vs The State of Telangana

Sudarshan Enshetti Vs The State of Telangana and another