The High Court dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment of criminal proceedings, declaring it infructuous due to the absence of a valid FIR.
Criminal Petition No. 6104 of 2015 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e9 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No:6104 OF 2015
Between:
Allare resident of H.No. S-g-22127 , Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad.
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to call for records in crime No. 11gl20f 5 on the file oi the court ot the ll Metropolitan Magistrate, at L.B.Nagar, cyberabad and to euash the proceedings initiated against the petitioners herein in the above case.
:]
CRLPMP NO: 6032 OF 201
Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the [Vlemorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to pass an order to stay of arrest of the petitioners ln crime No. 11812015 on the file of the court of the ll Metropolitan Magistrate, at L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the l,4emorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri KISHoRE RAl, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Mr. VIZARATH ALl, Assistant public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
,r
THE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRJMINAL PETITIoN No.61O4 OF 2O1S
ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 af Cr.P.C. seeking to call for the records in Crime No" 1 1B of 2015 on the file of the Court of the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, at L.B.Nagar, Cyberabad and quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioners.
I
Miscellanr:ous Petitions. pending if any, shaii stald ciosed
Sd/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY/' (i
SECTION OFFICER
To,
ka n \ V
HIGH COURT
DATED:1610612023
ORDER
CRLP.No.6104 of 2015
o s 1HE ST4y A
e
oo 15 J|JI znm v
I()
.a:
t *
Or cQ
PA.Tac'
THE CRIMINAL PETTTION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
.l .;,1 *
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashment of proceedings can be dismissed as infructuous in the absence of a valid FIR.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lashi Kumar Khanna and Others
State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
