Dismissed

M. Mallesh Yadav v. State of Telengana

Telangana HC16 Jun 2023CRLP/14492/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana entertained a Criminal Petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of proceedings. Counsel argued the cause became infructuous. The Court recorded objections and dismissed the petition as infructuous, closing pending miscellaneous petitions.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed.

M. Mallesh Yadav Vs State of Telengana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32ss ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

FRIDAY THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14492 oF 2014

¶7

Betwben

¶8

M. Mallesh Yadav, S/o M Balappa, Occ: Nil, R/o H. No. 14_1_131tA, Kondanda Ram Naqar, & T Colony, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad

¶9

2 M Santosh, S/o^"M tyqilq.! Viour,-O"",-r,rit, R/o H No. 14_1_131/A, Kondanda Ram Naqar. P & T Colony, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad

¶10

C Sadanand, S/oI Maile_sh occ:^{'eusin;sii,,-Rio'zd-toi,-} Shnrada Nagar, Behind Sliardha Theatre, Dilsukhnaqar. Hvderabad

¶11

B Sumalatha, Wo M B.Krishna Oc6. houlewife, R/o j2-1 1-565, Warasiguda, Secunderabad

¶12

M. Rambai, Wo M Maltesh Yadav Occ R/o H. No.^.14-1-131/A, Kondanda

¶13

^^{E_r* Nagar, P & T Colony, Dilsukhnagar, Hyderabad} 6 M Lalitha, Wo M Srisaitam, Occ:-Houde wife R/o 3_5_94g/.1 1g, Gandhi Kuteer, Narayanguda, Hyderabad

¶14

...PET|T|oNERS/ACCUSED 1,2&4TO7

¶15

¶16

'l State of Telengana, Represented by public prosecutor High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad

¶17

'RESP'NDENT/^..MPLAINANT

¶18

M. Manjulatha, wo M. Bharath, occ: housewife"

¶19

M Bharath, S/o M. Mallesh Yadav Occ: Business R/o plot No. 2g, p & T Colony, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad

¶20

...RESPONDENTS/DEACTO COMPLAINANTS

¶21

Petition under Section 482 of cr. p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to call for the record relating to p.R.c. No. 413 of 2014 on the file of the X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.

¶22

CRLPMP. NO:^'15297 OF 2014

¶23

Petition under section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance of the petitioners/A-1, 2, 4lo A-7 in P.R.c. No. 413 of 2014 on the fite of X Additionat chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.

¶24

iI ,1 i

¶25

Thrs Petttion coming on tor hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Crininal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri.lt/ A K.ttIUKHEED, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent Nos 2 & 3.

¶26

The Court made the following. ORDER

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL

¶28

CRIMINAL PETITION No.14492 OF 2014

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

Ms. Ruhi, learned counsel representing Mr" M.A.K. Mukheed, learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the subject matter of the criminal petition has become infructuous. Therefore, seeks to dismiss the criminal^petition as infructuous.

¶31

Mr. Yizarath /li, learned Assistant Public^Prosecutor

¶32

appearing for the respondent State takes no objection to the sarne. There is no representation on behalf of unofficial respondents.

¶33

Recording the sirbmission made by both the^leamed counsel, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶34

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶35

¶36

ASSrsrANid/RESY[XA //TRUE COPY/I qrSECTION OFFICER

¶37

¶38

The X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magiskate, Secunderabad. 2. One CC to Sri M.A.K.Mukheed, Advocaie IOPUCI

¶39

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court foithe State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT) 4. Two CD Copies Ki $-

HIGH COURT

DATED:16/06/2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.1zt492 ot 2o14

¶44

7,rt t''' iec
)c 1x I\tsB r lr
L)
., l * . -.',., i' -r',t
''-..-,#'

¶45

CRL.P. IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶46

t
/ A1
<br>6 d5(

M. Mallesh Yadav v. State of Telengana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M. Mallesh Yadav v. State of Telengana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Margoni Masaiah Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

Tanver Ahmed, Hyd., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Azeema Khatoon , Zeenath Bee, Hyd and 4 Othrs Vs Maleka Begum, Hyd and Ano

Smt. Ahemadi Begum, Hyd and 4 Othrs Vs Smt. Sadiya Tajammul, Nalgonda Dist. and Ano

Sameen Ahmed Khan, Sec-Bad Vs State of Telangana, Hyd and Anr.

Sashi Kumar Khanna, Hyd and 7 Otrs., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.