The High Court of Telangana disposed of a criminal petition filed by accused persons under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings. The court, noting the underlying case ended in acquittal, dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Criminal Petition No. 15822 of 2014 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 15822 OF 2014
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may bepleased to call for the record relating to C.C.No.'1833 of 2014 on the file of the Court of the Hon'ble ll AJCJ Cum XIX Metropolitan Magistrate, Miyapur, Cyberabad.
CRLPMP. NO: 3356 OF 2015
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the ordergranted on 23.12.2014 inCrl.MP.No. 16938 of 2O14 in Crl.P.No. 15822 of 2014 until further orders.
CRLPMP. NO: 899 C: :1015
BETWEEN:
Smt. K.Archana R dJy W/o. K.Sudheer Kumar Reddy, Agetl',:7 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o. F rt No.101 , East village, Balaji Nagar, Road \o.2, Nizampet, KPHB, Cyberabac
PETITIONEIT/;I"d RESPONDENT
AND
1.t RESPONDENT
..PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 & 4
Petition unde Siection 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in lhe circumstances stated in lhe IVlemor rndum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, ttre l-ligh Court may be pleased to vacat tre interior directions granted in Crl.l/ P No.16938/20't4 in Crl. P. No. 1 5822 l2Ct1. <la|ed 23.1 2.2O1 4.
This Petition o.ning on for hearing, upon perr.rsing lho [V]emorandum of Grounds of C)rimir rl Petition and upon hearing the a-g -rments of Sri K ADILAKSHI'll, Advo a1efor the Petitioner and the Assistant I)Lrblic Prosecutor for the State of Telang nrr <;n behalf of the Respondent No 1 ard llone Appeared for the Respondent o.2
The Court made the fcllowing: ORDER
ORDER:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO .1s822 0F 20t4
This Criminai Petition rs liled by the petitioners/ accused lVos.2 and 4 undcr Section ,l82 of Cr.p.C. seeking to call for tl.re rci:ords pertaining to (lC No. l833 of 2Ol4 on the llle of the learned II AJCJ -cum XIX Mcrropolitan Magistratc, Miyapur, Cyberabad and also l.o rluash rhc procccclings therein.
I "l
l'age 2 ol-l
for propertr i'rrl i.hat Irer in I'tu's. who are thepc trttcnersherein also lorne'd lrz xls r'vith their solt and abltsc(l tlr( ,i r,:spondent in filthr Ianqu a1 r and u'hr:n the 2rr(1 responde 1t ask, d rcr husbald to stop consr n-ing zrlcohol, hc beat her and 1.r orl t,l kilL her by holding her r^ :r:k during thc: c1r,r,rrrel. Acco-drng', alicr arrresting thc petitLoncl i arld issuing krok out circular aSirins;t K.Sudheer Kumar Redd' , the police have investigaterl in to [h€ matter and larrl chargr' r rr:et, arrlrvingI I'rc petilionels r-Lrr,:l t-reir son as accuscd :.n rl 1,) samc s'as nnrnbcred as CC No -r 33 ol 20 l4
'il +. conle nLion ol tl're petitione's is I rilt the\ are no \r zr<sup>('onnecrr I u'ith thc aJlcqccl actior-rs zLs th : 2"I rcspondent ne ,cr s[er'€](l r'th thenr in InrlizL and in lact she |esided u'ith her husbarnd ir u stralia and that since no irrirna 1 rci,: mtrterial is fottnd agairrs t 16i1 lnrl sort, r.rho u'as arrzrvr:d as ir tcr-rsed No.3, he ivas not cha 1'-s,heeted ancl that baseless, and lalse allcgations arc made rrg ri ]st them onlv to extract nono| lro r-r them and hencc. ther' ::luested to quitsh the proce:dings ins;ofar as thev relate to thcn
I)age 3 ol3
addressed by the Sub-lnspector of Police, KPHB Potice Station stated that CC No.1833 of 2Ol4 on the file of the learned XV AMM Court, Kukatpally, Medchal-Malka_igiri District, sprouted from FIR No.599 of 2Ol4 ended in acquittal on 22.O4.2O16 and hence, no further orders are required and seeks to dismiss the petition as infruc tuous.
stands dismissed
//TRUE COPYII
I L Sd/. K . [*ro, ASSISTANT REQsrnan I Q} SECTION OFFICER
To,
pr
HIGH COURI
DATED: 0710'12023
s
l
+*
rl
<br>.-,i -'-.-..4:.'
-\i-
ORDER
CRLP.No" 15t 22 ot 2014
DIMISSING T 1E CRL.PETITION
AS INFRUCT )US
f,
t( y_.
a). t \f>-0))
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present criminal petition should be dismissed as infructuous because the underlying complaint case resulted in acquittal and no further orders are required.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt K.Adilakshmi
K.Narender Reddy
The State Of Telangana
Smt. K.Archana Reddy
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
