Dismissed

Bhadrappa , Bhadranna v. Penna Cement Industries Ltd., and Another

Telangana HC6 Jul 2023CRLP/7712/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings, holding that the subject matter of the petition was already closed before the court below as the underlying criminal complaint had been closed earlier.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Petition No. 7712 of 2015 is dismissed as infructuous.

Bhadrappa , Bhadranna Vs Penna Cement Industries Ltd… — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

I i i I )

¶2

t^32ss l

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶7

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7712 0F 2015

¶8

Between:

¶9

BHADRAPPA (O BHADRANNA, S/o. Basawanth Occ:Advocate, R/o. H.No.9_

¶10

480, Htc 3, cDXGokui Nrg"i,-cr6r'rsr-fti?n'i"r." st"t".

¶11

...PET|TIoNER/ACCUSED

¶12

AND

¶13

PENNA CEMENT INDUSTRIES LID., REP., bY Sri HAriSh ChANdrA, Chicf GENCTAI ^^{Manager (works) Berkatur vrrage,rin'dliil,i"iii,'irng, Reddy} district.

¶14

State of Tetangana, rep., by p,iutic Frbsecu#, Hibiib"rrt;i iid;;rH;

¶15

...Resporuoeivrs/coMpLAtNANT

¶16

petition under Section ^492^{0f cr p.c praying that in the circumstances} stated in rhe Memorandum of Grounds of crrminarheiition, the Hign cJri'r* o" p!"T_"9^toquash the proceedinss in cc.No.72 ifi zotq on tnl iii" oiin" jrii"i"r First Class Magistrate at Tandur R.R.District.

¶17

l.A. NO: 2 0F 2015 CRLPMP. NO:10559 oF 2015

¶18

Petition under Section :52 o! Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum.of Grounds or criminat'peiition, the High court mav be preased to amend the cc.No 72 or 201s "" cc.N".;r;i 2oi6 i"' q"riri tili lil'itii, and also stay petition in Crl.p.NO.77 t2 of 201i. cc 10569/2015number is amended as per court ordei Dated 2gr 12l2o1s in crr.M.p.No.

¶19

l.A. NO:1 oF2015(C RLPMP. NO:7618 OF 20151

¶20

Petition under Section laz o! cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal'peiition, the i6h ffi;;;; pleased to slay of a, further-proceedings incrudinj personar appearance of the petitioner in cc.No.72 of 2015 on the fi6 or tn"lrtiJirr rioi crl!. n,t"g,lt;i"';t Tandur R.R.District, pending quash petition.

¶21

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri p PRABHAKAR REDD', Advocate for the petitioner ano of sri p. subhash, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and of Vizarath AIi, rearned Assistant pubric Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2. The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No.77L2 OF 2015

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

The present Criminal Pctition is filed undcr Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash thr: proceedings in C.C.No.72 of 2Ol4 on the file of learned Judicial First Class Magistrate. Tandur, Ranga Reddy District.

¶26

Heard Mr. P. Prabhal<ar Reddy, learncd counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vizar:rtl-r Ali, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for tl're respondenl Statr:. There is no representation on beha-lf of trnofficial respondent No.1

¶27

Learned counsel for tht: petitioner submits that the subject matter of the Criminal Petition is closed before the Court below and no further orders are necessary in the Criminal Petition. Therefore, seeks t-o dismiss the Criminal Petition as infructuous.

¶28

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that C.C.No.72 of 2Ol5 has been closed vide order dated O1.06.2019 on the file of the learned .Junior Civil Judge, Tandur ald therefore, seeks to dismiss the Criminal Petition i1s infructuous.

¶29

To substantiate the same, leanred counsel filed a copy of e-courts

¶30

proceedings

¶31

Recording the submissions made by both the^learned counsel, this Criminal Petition is dismissed^{as infructuous.}

¶32

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶33

//TRUE COPY//

¶34

Sd/- C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Ab

¶35

SECTION OFFICER

¶36

¶37

'1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Tandur R,R.District.

¶38

The Station House Officer, Tandur police Station, Ranga Reddy District.

¶39

One CC to Sri^p. prabhakar Reddy, Advocate [OpUC]

¶40

4 Two ccs to pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of rerangana (oUT)

¶41

Two CD Copies

BJLB \

*/-

HIGH COURT

DATED: 06107t2023

ORDER

CRLP.No.7712 of2015

,21. : ,,',.;> :; t ar p o;
/
'.
i I'r Nj$ 2$E
,/
:i

¶49

CRIMINAL PETITION 1S DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

Bhadrappa , Bhadranna v. Penna Cement Industries Ltd., and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhadrappa , Bhadranna v. Penna Cement Industries Ltd., and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Irfan Mohiuddin, Hyd Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and 5 Othrs

G.Naveen Kumar Vs G.Sudha Rani and 2 Others

Mir Qamar Hasan Razvi, R.R.Dt., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Bharath, Mbnr Dist. Vs State of Telangana, Rep. by P.P., Hyd and Anr.

Tameezuddin Ahmed and Another Vs the State of Telangana and Another

Manoj Tiwari, Chhattisgarh., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.