The High Court of Telangana dismissed Criminal Petition No. 14922 of 2014 filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings due to the petitioner's non-appearance on multiple hearing dates, characterizing the matter as non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO:'14922 OF 2014
Between:
V.SEENAIAH, HYD.,, Occ Btisiness, R/o. Plot No.23,Door No.3-1-630/2,Kakatiya Colony, Road No.3, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad-74
...PETtTIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT/ DEFACTO COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,the High Courtmay be pleased to quash theproceedings in CC.No. 504 of2013 on the file of the lX Addl. Chief tvtetropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 158 04 0F 2014)
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition,the High Courtmay be pleased to stay all furtherproceedings including theappearance of the petitioner in CC.No. 504 of 2013 on the file of the lX Addl. ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad
Thrs Petitron comtng on for hearing, uponperusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and uponhearingthe argumentsof Sri Sajja Sn Rama Suryam, Advocate for the Petitioner andSri VizarathAli, AssistantPublic
i
Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
I
I
CRIMINAL PETITION N0.14922 of 2OL4
ORDER:
None appears for the petitioner. Even on the previous date of hearing i.e., on O2.l)..2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Today, though the matter was listed under the caption 'For Dismissal', none appeared for the petitioner.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
closed
SD/. L. SIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 'L The lX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, at Nampally, Hyderabad
$t.-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0811112023
ORDER
1 $E s TArG' o
,(
5 q
3 B6 i. : q 2020 a
.{
O6' C \t ()
CRLP.No.14922 of 2014
DISMISSING THE CRIMINALPETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION
r\r-<br>t^ x
V.Seeniah
The State of Telangana
Bhavanam Srinivas Reddy
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
