The High Court disposed of a quashing petition filed under Section 482 CrPC after noting that the accused had been acquitted by the lower court. The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Criminal Petition No. 14871 of 2014 dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTHDAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14871 OF 2014
Between:
Both 1 and 2 are Ryo. H.No.3-1 19l2lD, Plot No.19,Bheem ReddyNagar Colony, Boduppal Village, Ghatkesar Mandal,Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
AND
...RESPONOENTS/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedingsin CC No503 ol 2014on the file of lll MM Cyberabad, R.R. District at L.B.Nagar.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2014 CRLPMP. NO:154960F 2014
Petition under Section482 ofCr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petltion,the HighCourt may be pleased to dispense with thefiling of the Certified copy of the Proceedingsin CC No. 503 of 2014 on thefile of lllN/M Cyberabad, R.R. Districtat L.B. Nagar.
l.A. NO:2 oF 201 4(CRLPMP. NO: 15757 OF 2014
Petition under Section 482 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in cc.no.503/2014 dated 20.11.2013 on the file of the lll M.M., cyberabad, R.R.District at L.B.Nagar pending disposar of the above Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri p. vENKATA RAo, Advocate for the Petitioner (Not present) and the Assistant public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri B. BAL REDDY, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I \
I t
HONOURABLE SRI JIISTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIM INAL PETITION No.1487L of 2Ol4
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is liled underSection 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash C.C.No.SO3 of 2Ol4on the hle of the learned III Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad atL.B. Nagar'
2
7 . Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructr-rous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this criminal petition, shall stand closed
SD/. C. PRAVEE KUMAR ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION FFICER
To,
MP
GJ
*ut
HIGH COURT
DATED:0811112023
ORDER
CRL.P.No.14871 of 2014
1 6C STA 16:
(
oJ
o 0 B ,lA\ 2024 (,
t
OEspnrcs go *
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
ilA
]<br>-.y
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a criminal petition seeking quashing of proceedings should be dismissed as infructuous based on acquittal in the lower court?
Whether the Court can proceed to dismiss the petition without representation from the petitioners?
Whether acquisition of online case status showing acquittal justifies treating the petition as infructuous?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Karnati Mohan Reddy
Chandra Shekar Reddy
The State of Telangana
G. Goverdhan Goud
M. Rama Krishna
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
