High Court of Telangana disposed of a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C seeking quashing of proceedings. The Court held that the role of the accused could only be ascertained via trial, leaving alternative remedies and dispensing with their presence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 32991
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7236 0F 2015
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENT/DE-FACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in CC No-189/2014 pending on the file of X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, S€cunderabad in so far as the petitioners i.e. A-8 and A-9 are concerned to meet the ends of justice.
CRLPMP. NO: 7'154 OF 2015
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proc€edings including arrest and appearance of
I
/
petitioners A-8 & A9 are concerned in cc No:189/2014 on the fire of X Addr. chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri JTTHENDER RAO VEE*AMALLA, Advocate for the petitioner and the Assistant pubric Prosecutor br the state of rerangana on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared fc r the Respondent No.2
The Court nrade the following: ORDER
.-.
THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICEE. V. VENUEIoPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.7236oF 2015
ORDER:
This criminalpetition is frled by the petitioners/ accused No.8 and 9 seeking toquash the proceedingsin C'C'No'189 of 2014 pending on thefile of X AdditionalChief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabadin so far as the petitionersi'e' A8 and A9 are concerned.
\ \
)
nor the ex(:cutor and the same will not attract the provisions of criminal lary and hence seeks to allow this criminal petition.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/. V. HARI PRASAD //rRUE coPY// ASSISTANT.SEGISTRAR v
SECTION OFFICER
To
t\c\r
HIGH COURT DATED: OZl11t2023
ORDER CRLP.N<r.723G of 2015
E (-
.r<br>r.) ( -..1v
tU
r'-) llc*
c\ o
c 1;51\ *
DISPOSII{G OF THE CRL.PETITION
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition seeking quashal of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C due to alleged false implication merits quashing or alternative remedies.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
L.Suresh Kumar & Ors.
The State Of Telangana
A.Kapil Kuqar
E.V. VENUGOPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
