Dismissed

R.S. Dasaratha Ram Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC7 Nov 2023CRLP/13279/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Writ Petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings in C.C. No. 326 of 2015. Petitioner submitted no representation. Assistant Public Prosecutor argued the case does not survive, rendering the petition infructuous. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC dismissed as infructuous.

R.S. Dasaratha Ram Reddy Vs The State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[^32se ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE'

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

cRIMINAL PETITION NO.13279 OF²⁰¹⁵

¶7

Between:

¶8

R.S. Dasaratha Ram Reddy, S/o^{SathyanarayanaReddy, Aged} .^Major,Occ Business, Fi,/o H.No. 3-3-199/il 5/A,^{Picket,'Cantonment, Secunderabad,Hyderabad} - 500 003

¶9

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by the^{PublicProsecutor,High Courtof} Judicature at Hyderabad.

¶12

2 M/s Sriram City Union Finance,^{Bala Nagar Branch, represented.by.Legal} Assis Cum-Au[horised Signatory,^{Sri.B.Venkateshwar. Red-dy'Havingits} office at 2-102,ll Floor,^{BlS. Coniplex, Blanssgar, Hyderabd-42.}

¶13

...RESPONDENT/OEFACTO.COM^PLAINANT

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminalPetition, the High court may} be pleased to Quash the^{proceedingsagainst the Petitionerin CC. No' 326 of} 2O1S on the file of the Learned^{3'd Special Melropolitan MagistrateCyberabad,} Ranga Reddy District, at^MiYaPUr.

¶15

l.A. NO: 1OF 201 CRLPMP. NO: 13194 OF^201s)

¶16

Petition under section 482 of^{cr.P.cpraying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminalPetition, the High courtmay} be pleased to stay of all^{further proceedings against the Petitioner herein in c.c.}

¶17

No.326 of 2015 on the file of the Learned 3'd Special Metropolitan [Vagistrate Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District, at N/iyapur

¶18

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLPMP. NO: 10 OF 2016)

¶19

Petition under Section 482 ot Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the lVlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to allow the^petition and receive the Documents filed herewith in the interest of^justice.

¶20

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri GONE RAMESH, Advocate (Not Present) for the Petitioner and Mr. VIZARATH ALI, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

¶23

¶24

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{E. v. VENUCTOPAL} CRIMINAL PETITION NO.L3279 oF 201s

¶25

¶26

ORDER:

¶27

The present criminal petition is frled to^{quash the} proceedings against the petitioner in C.C.No.326 of 2Ol5 on^the file of III Special Metropolitan^{Magistrate, Cyberabad, Ranga} Reddy District at Miyapur and^pass such^{other orders as the} Court deems frt and^proPer.

¶28

There is no representation on behalf^{of petitioner.}

¶29

Mr. Vizarath Ali, Learned^{Assistant Public Prosecutor would} submit that the cause in the criminal^{petitiondoes not surviveas} the case in 326 of 2015 on the file of III^{Special Metropolitart} Magistrate, Cyberabad, Ranga^{Reddy District at Miyapur and} therefore seeks to dismiss the criminal^{petitionas infructuous.}

¶30

Recording the submissions^{made by the learned Assistant} Public Prosecutor, this Court^{is inclined to dismiss this Criminal} Petition as infructuous.

¶31

Accordingly, the criminal^{petition isdismissedas} infructuous.

¶32

¶33

MiscellaneousPetitions,pendingifany,shallstandclosed'

¶34

¶35

SD/. P. PADMANABHA^REDDY ASSrsrANr RE$9,RAR \

¶36

//TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶37

To,

¶38

The 3.d Special Metropolitan^{Magistrate Cyberabad, Ranga Reddy District,} at Miyapur.

¶39

2.TheStationHouseOfficer,BalanagarPoliceStation,Balanagar, Hyderabad.

¶40

One CC to SRI^{GONE RAMESH, Advocate} [OPUC]

¶41

Two CCs to Public^{Prosecutor,High court for the state of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUTI

¶42

Two CD Copies

MP GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:07 t11t2023

1 $E STA ref
(
oo 21 IEC 2023 o
.2,+
*
t o .S r..T C<br>

¶47

ORDER

¶48

CRL.P.No.132T9 of ZOlS

¶49

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶50

,D>:g

R.S. Dasaratha Ram Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.S. Dasaratha Ram Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Ajay Kumar Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

G.Ashok Prasad and Another Vs Pootla Venkatesh and Others

Mohammed Quayyum Vs the State of Ap., Rep.by Its P.P

L.Suresh Kumar and Another Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Mekala Naveen Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Jmj Travels rep by T.Anil Joseph Reddy Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another