Dismissed

Madala Rama Rao v. the State of Telangana and Another

Telangana HC15 Nov 2023CRLP/13159/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C by the accused-petitioner seeking to set aside an order dated 12-09-2014. The dismissal was on the ground of non-prosecution, as no representative appeared before the Court on multiple hearing dates.

What did the court decide?

Criminal petition No. 13159 of 2014 dismissed for non-prosecution.

Madala Rama Rao Vs the State of Telangana and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

I32ee I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER . TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 13159 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

MADALA RAMA RAO, S/o.Late Sri M. Nagabhushana, Age 60 years, Occ Professor, H.No.1-4-880/2015, New Bakaram ,B OB Colony, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND

¶10

1 . THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Rep.by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyd. 2. Suresh Mishra, Flat t'lo.1, Shanti Apartments Street No.9, Lane No.1, Tarnaka, Secunderabad - 17.

¶11

...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS

¶12

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, lhe High Court may be pleased to allow the Criminal Petition by setting aside the order d1.12.O9.2O14 in Crl.MP.No.1406 of 2014 on the file of the Special Magistrate-Vl, Hyderabad and consequentially direct the court below to call for the records and examine the same

¶13

l.A. NO: 2 OF 201S(CRLPMP. NO: 4782 OF 2015)

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in Crl.MP.No.1 3749 of 2014 in Crl.P.No.13159 of 2014 dt.O7.11.2014 and consequently dismiss the Crl,P.No.13159 of 2014 as the same is devoid of merits in the interest of^justice.

¶15

l.A. NO: 2OF 2020

¶16

Petilion under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim stay order dated 07-11-201 .4 and 10-01.-2020),

¶17

i : !t ! E I t '' )i .i .1 I

¶18

passed in l.A.No. I of 2014 (Crl.P.MP 73749 of 2014) and l.A No. 1 of 2O2O in Crl.P. 13159 of 2O1 .4, till hear the Crl.Petition.

¶19

l.A- NO: 1OF 2029

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court^{may be} pleased to extend stay order dl: 0711112O14 and 2410912019 in I A NO 1 ot 2O14 in CrlP No 13159 of 2014 till hear the Crl Petition and^pass

¶21

l.A" NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 13749 OF 2014)

¶22

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may^be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.79 of 2014 on n the file of the Special Magistrate -Vl Erramanzil, Hyderabad^pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition and to^pass

¶23

l.A NO:^'l OF 2019

¶24

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may^be pleased to extend the interim stay order daled.OT .11.2O14 passed in l.A.No. 0112014 ( Crl.M.P.No. 13749120141ⁱⁿ Crl.P.No.^1315912014 till^hear the^Crl.P.

¶25

This Petition coming on for hearing,upon^perusing the Memorandum of Grounds o[ Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V S SUMITRA VARALAKSHT!,11, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Vizarath Ali, Asst. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri Veera Prasada Chary, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

I I I

I i

HONOURABLE SRI^{JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL}

¶31

CRIMINAL PETITION^{No.13159 of2Ol4}

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

This Criminal^{Petition is filed seeking to set aside the} order dated^{l2.Og.2Ol4in Cr1.M.P.No.1406of 2Ol4 on the} file of the learned^{Special Magistrate} -^{VI, Hyderabad'}

¶34

None appears for the^{petitioner though the matteris} listed under the^{caption Tor Dismissal'. Learned Assistant} Public Prosecutor^{appearingfor the respondent-Stateis} present.

¶35

On perusal of the^{proceeding sheet, it marifests that} even on the^{previousdate of hearing i.e', on O2'll 2023} and 09. I I .2023, there^{was no representation forthe} petitioner. Thus, it appears^{that the petitioneris not} interested to^{prosecutethe matter vigilantly and diligenttl} anv more, therefore,^{this criminal petition is liable to be} dismissed for^non Prosecution.

¶36

Accordingly, this^{crimina-lpetition is dismissedfor} non-prosecution.^{However, it is needless to mention that}

¶37

¶38

the petitioner is at liberty to work out the alternative

¶39

remedies as available under law

¶40

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall

¶41

stand closed.

¶42

SD/- V.HARI PRASAD ASSTSTANT //TRUE COPY// \EGTSTRAR i}SECTION OFFICER

¶43

To,

¶44

The Special Magistrate lV, Erramanzil, Hyderabad.

¶45

One CC to Sri V.S. Sumitra varalakshmi, Advocate [OPUC]

¶46

i t L a I I .

¶47

i ilw: CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana (OUT)
, ,rfr
4. ' Two CD Copies

¶48

BJLB NS S(.

¶49

i II Il t I Ii II I i t I t ,

! it tt 5

t I :t 1 J

HIGH COURT

DATED:15/11/2023

ORDER

1 $E SrAr 6
(
3 ) 27 JAN 2024
* DF.9 pa'r c',',(o'

¶56

CRLP.No.13159 of 2014

¶57

CRIMINAL PETITION^{IS DISMISSED} FOR NON. PROSECUTION

¶58

@tv^, \q\r1>-'t'

Madala Rama Rao v. the State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madala Rama Rao v. the State of Telangana and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kandi Ram Reddy Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Mr.G.Ram Murthy Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Akash Deepsingh Virk Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Pp

B. Satya Rao Vs The State of Telangana.,rep.,Spl Pp for CBI

Bonagiri Mallaiah , Mallesh (A-1) Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Pradeep Chandra Behara, Hyd and Anr., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp. and Anr.