The High Court, Hyderabad, heard a Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous since the underlying trial case had already been disposed of by the trial court in the past.
The Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12919 OF 2015
Between:
B. Satya Rao, S/o Late B.V. Narasanna, Flat No.A-4, 4th Floor, Emerald Arcade, Prasanth Nagar, New Nallakunta, Hyderabad -1 3.
...Petitioner/Accused No. 1
AND
The State of Telangana.,rep by its Special Public Prosecutor for CBl, High Court at Hyderabad
...Respondent
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C.No. 212012 on the file of the lll Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad against the petitioner (Al).
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(CRLPMP. NO: 12858 OF 2015 )
Petition under Section 482 of Cr-P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioner (Al ) in C.C No. 212012 on the lll Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad pending disposal of the Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P.V. VENKATA RAVI SANKAR, (Not Present) Advocate for the Petitioner and of M/s. Ananthi, Learned Special Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION No.12919 OF 2015
ORDER:
The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings against the petitioner/accused No.1 in C.C.No.2 of 2Ol2 on the file of the learned III Additional Special Judge for CBI Cases, Hyderabad (for short, "the trial Court").
2
Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall sta,d closed.
Sd/. MOHD.SANAULLAH ANS RI ASSISTANT REGI R
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFICER
PSR a\ gh
HIGH COURT
DATED:1511112023
ORDER
CRLP.No.12919 o12015
oR lltE s14 rq
('
oo 1 0 APB 2OZ4 r'/-
o
a€s T C f,o
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS.
@,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition filed under Section 482 of CrPC seeking quashal of proceedings is maintainable when the underlying case has already been disposed of.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B. Satya Rao
The State of Telangana
E.V. VENUGOPAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
